I’ve been unmotivated in the past but i think it’s time to sort out an alternative.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 months ago

    A: they’re betting most people will accept it, and they’re right. The same thing happened in the early 80s when cable television advertised themselves as the pay-for-ad-free service, then started sneaking ads in. People complained, sure, but we all saw the outcome. They got away with it.

    B: Greed, capitalism, and fuck you.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      A: they’re betting most people will accept it, and they’re right.

      Yes. Remember when Netflix put a stop to password sharing and the internet went aflame with people declaring that Netflix had shot itself in the foot? Netflix subscriber counts went up.

      The average person will put up with so much more of this nonsense than techie people will.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      i haven’t had cable, or even a tv, in many years. stayed at a hotel the other day and flicked on the tv because the internet was out (helene), and was flabbergasted that for every 2 minutes of programming, there was at least 5 minutes of the same commercials over and over. people fucking watch this shit? on purpose?

      • Graphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        When my wife and I stay at a hotel we watch cable and put on like QVC shopping channels.

        It’s fun to overreact and be like “this is 100 genuine silver painted lead.” Some of the channels will have like changing infographics that flash and explode every second as the price keeps dropping so we make wooshing sounds as it keeps falling to a new low.

    • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cable television never advertised that. Cable TV started as a “community antenna” system that served people in valleys with existing off-the-air broadcast channels (which had ads); the existence of those systems created a market for satellite-fed channels like HBO (which was always a separate subscription and ad-free) and TBS/CNN (which always carried ads). Other than the premium channels like HBO/Showtime/Cinemax, cable channels have had ads from the beginning.

      Once the small cable systems and the media publishers both got consolidated, we started seeing content licensing deals and higher costs to the subscriber to pay for it - but the channels (MTV, Nickelodeon, etc) always carried ads.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It definitely did. I remember it vividly (I was alive back then). And I’m talking about the premium services, specifically (e: which was the point of my comparison: the premium paid services back then advertised no-ad service, then included ads, just like the premium streaming services are doing today).

        Here’s an article from the NYT in 1981 on the topic:

        WILL CABLE TV BE INVADED BY COMMERCIALS?

      • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not correct. My parents were early adopters and I remember there were newspaper articles when the first channel started showing ads.

        …a newspaper is like a primitive early printed facebook.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes and no. Networks had ads but cable began inserting their own ads in addition to the network ads. When I ran a company I did large media buys with cable companies. I would buy ads from the regional cable company which would air in between the national ads of Comedy Central, Discovery, etc.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The answer is apathy.

    You have to remember that most users simply don’t care. The majority of consumers are some combination of either not technologically savvy or just outright intimidated by technology, are not very well educated, are incredibly reluctant to read, are not particularly observant, will not leave their routines or comfort zones without very significant motivation, and have spent their entire lives being the very frog in that gradually boiling pot of ever more numerous and intrusive advertising to the point that they just accept this as “normal.” They’re busy. They don’t read tech headlines. They don’t understand what’s going on under the hood, and nor do they want to.

    Normal people don’t see the world like us nerds do. I am positive that these streaming services (and many other businesses) have studied this and understand it very well. If they lose 1% of their business which was made up by vocal nerds, but whatever odious change the just rolled out results in an increase in profit that is greater than the revenue from those subscriptions lost, they’ll go ahead and do it anyway.

    They think they have a captive audience because by and large they functionally do have a captive audience. This stuff works, and people keep paying for it en masse.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, look at Reddit. Huge uproar last year, nothing happened really.

      Pretty much every service, platform, app has become worse over the last two or three years. But people keep using them. And not for a lack of alternatives. They are actively hostile against change and many really don’t care. They are so used to being fucked over, squeezed for pennies and bombarded with bullshit ads, that they gave up.

      The same thing happens in politics, btw. People just vote whatever - if at all, because they already expected to be fucked over. All those activists you see on TV or online are a tiny minority.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Their entire survival hinges on keeping investment money flowing, which means they essentially have to lie and over-promise.

    A chronic issue plaguing the entire tech and media sector right now. Line must go up no matter the costs.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    They don’t care about you. They don’t even want you as a subscriber, you’re a pain in the ass. Most people are too tired and not tech savvy enough to pirate. A lot of those will eventually do something else, too, but they can cram ads into the streams faster than those people can find the wherewithal to leave.

    In short, this is profitable, and no amount of raging will make it less so. Take care of yourself, but don’t pretend you’re making line go down.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Statistics. You’re still there and only complaining. I purged all subscription parasites from my life in 2019.

    I live by the abstraction, “you can’t fix stupid in anyone else but yourself.” All you can do is tell others what you did with your one wallet vote and hope that others do the same at some critical mass.

    They do it because you’re still there, and you care while they do not. You want to think you’re human. You’re not. You’re a new deck chair on a yacht if you’re lucky. Most likely, you’re no more than a liter or few of diesel.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because most people aren’t going to ditch them regardless of how many ads they put, and that’s good enough for them.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because netflix tested it and it was worth it for them. The increased revenue from ads more than made up the subscription fees of users lost.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What in turn is short sighted. A new age of Piracy is on the rise my friends… time to sail again.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because of the people they loose due to the price hike, more will stay for the new price.

  • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Already lots of great answers, but I’ll add a note about intentional barriers to exit.

    Many services tend to make it easy to sign up and comparably more difficult to quit. So while people always can leave and take their business elsewhere, they might not have the motivation to do it. I imagine each additional click in a form deters more and more people. OP mentioned being unmotivated, and these barriers play into that.

    It’s like wandering around in Ikea. You could use a map and chart out the fastest route to find what you need and get out. But it’s so much easier to follow the little path they draw out on the floor and look at everything, which makes you way more likely to impulsively buy something extra.

  • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    The economy is in a weird spot where data looks alright (employment and gdp) but the covid economy hit everyone including your friendly neighborhood corporation. Ads are a simple and reliable way to turn up profits in a soft economy and declining global situation and inflation. Since companies have effectively stolen wages for so many years they can’t cope with modest wage spike on their bottom line or really any disruption anywhere in their business they use ads to print money. Maybe as time goes on business will benefit from slowing wage growth and increasing automation we will see ad growth scale back. Regulation would be nice but what are you going to do?

    https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2021/03/COVID-inequality-and-automation-acemoglu.htm

    https://www.atlantafed.org/blogs/macroblog/2024/06/27/are-real-wages-catching-up

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re sure you will, or some will, but the number of customers they lose will be offset by the revenue gained.

    Since that’s the only metric they really care about at the end of the day it makes “sense” to them to do it.

  • bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    You are a statistic. The question isn’t do you exist but how many of you exist. When there is enough money to be made by serving people like you with fewer ads someone will do it. Until then though you are not worth the money it costs too keep you so good riddance.

    of course the above is why some demographics don’t watch much tv. They somewhat care but not enough to serve those demographict.

    may I suggest you take up tatting, mandolin, welding, bike riding… there are a long list of other things you can do with your time either on a theme/variation from above or not mentioned. These are all hobbies and you can find some to fill all that time you free o up.