• flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You’ve got a point, if Elon did this for the right people would be screaming corruption, paying people only if they agree to vote the way you want them to is shady as fuck regardless of which side is doing it

    I’m probably just joining you in getting dogpiled here but oh well

    • zarkony@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can’t tell if you are being sarcastic or not, because Elon actually is doing that.

      In both these cases, the payment technically isn’t directly for voting for a specific candidate. The payment is for an unrelated action that only someone voting for your candidate would agree with. Either way, still smells bad.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2024/10/07/elon-musks-pac-is-paying-47-for-each-solicited-petition-signature-from-a-swing-state-voter-heres-why-its-controversial/

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The payment is for an unrelated action that only someone voting for your candidate would agree with.

        Supporting free speech and gun rights (literally all the petition says) is something only a Trump voter would agree with?

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Didn’t say that.

            But the petition is being sold here as “pledging to vote for Trump”. which it plainly isn’t. It’s also been sold in this Lemmy thread as paying voters to sign a petition that only Trump voters would ever agree to sign.

            The petition that allegedly only Trump voters would ever agree to sign, only states that you support free speech and gun rights. Whether or not I think Musk actually genuinely supports those things (I don’t) is irrelevant, that’s what the actual petition says.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not being sarcastic, and I don’t follow American politics that closely so I didn’t know about this. I also don’t see why people think the right response to that is to just do the same thing though

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not following, I don’t live in the US. If he’s doing it too that also sucks but I don’t think stooping to that level is the way to solve that problem

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Then read through the website linked and understand what is going on here if you’re not following.

          • flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Having read up on the article about musk doing this, he’s not restricting it to people who are going to vote for a specific party which is the thing I take issue with.

            Nothing wrong with paying people to vote in general, paying people only if they are going to vote the way you want them to sucks

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Nothing wrong with paying people to vote in general

              It’s literally illegal.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Note that it’s still illegal to pay someone to vote, full stop. Does not matter if you’re not telling them specifically who to vote for.

        • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s been pointed out that he is in fact doing it, several times actually. I’m actually pretty sure this is directly a result of the Muskrat doing it.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can’t actually find the tweet you’re talking about but I’m assuming he’s deleted it or something

        From what people are saying it sounds like he was just paying non voters to vote at all, not restricting it to only people who shared his political beliefs

        I’d applaud it if that was what CAH were doing but they’re specifically whitelisting people they agree with to be able to get the money, IE paying people to agree with them

        • Freefall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They are paying “people that didn’t vote in 2020”. It is ultimately a foil of Musks rightwing, but not reaaalllyy wiiink. Just theirs it more aimed towards blue voters, but only because the right struggles to insult their godking…but ultimately it is just words and not telling them to VOTE BLUE. Just like Musk is trying to get his predominantly red crowed to register and get paid, but not TELLING them to vote red

          It is completely asinine and a symptom of our trash system.

          • flashgnash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Cah literally say in their FAQ that this is only offered to “the bluest voters” and imply (whether it’s true or not I don’t know) that they have information about who’s voted what and when to verify that

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Musk is using the same data to target this offer to red-leaning voters, he’s just not being as explicit about it.

              Again, CaH saying the quiet part out loud and being very blatant about it while still being totally legal is the point.

              • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                How’s he targeting it though, my understanding was it was just a straight twitter post