Are there any alternatives to the Internet Archive that are built around P2P, so that everyone can contribute to hosting/sharing web archives? Seems like having all these important archives hosted by a single organization isn’t the best idea for longevity/redundancy

@opensource

  • CameronDev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I figured that every node would need to scrap the site, in order to validate the content. If there are thousands of nodes, that would ddos the site.

    I don’t really understand how PoW would solve that, can you explain?

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I figured that every node would need to scrap the site, in order to validate the content. If there are thousands of nodes, that would ddos the site.

      with cryptocurrencies the blockchain is distributed, its not stored centrally. your idea could work similarly

    • Sem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it can be done like a NFTs on top of Bitcoin. In this case evey archived page is NFT and all the blockchain is available, so there is no centralized cite. If each action will require some computations (PoW) then ddos attack or spam attack will be very hard to implement.

      • CameronDev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Thats for proving its untampered with right? I’m more thinking of validating the archive copy is a “true” copy when adding it initially, which requires each node to check against the live site?

        Its definitely an intriguing idea though, but I don’t know enough to know how feasable it can be