androidisking@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 7 days agoNo ads here!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1imageNo ads here!lemmy.worldandroidisking@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-squareChemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoUntil Google demanded from its vassal (Mozilla) the removal of support for extensions. Mozilla doesn’t have enough resources to do without Google
minus-squareyamanii@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 days agoSo open themselves up for more antitrust lawsuits? Telling another browser what to do.
minus-squarepurrtastic@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-26 days agoI have no idea why you’re getting down voted. It’s essentially true. The arrangement is vital for Mozilla. According to the Mozilla Foundation’s 2021–2022 financial statement, which is the most recent one published, $510 million out of its $593 million in revenue came courtesy of Google’s search payments. https://fortune.com/2024/08/05/mozilla-firefox-biggest-potential-loser-google-antitrust-search-ruling/
minus-squareChemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-26 days agoUnfortunately it happens more frequently than I’d like
Until Google demanded from its vassal (Mozilla) the removal of support for extensions. Mozilla doesn’t have enough resources to do without Google
So open themselves up for more antitrust lawsuits? Telling another browser what to do.
I have no idea why you’re getting down voted. It’s essentially true.
Unfortunately it happens more frequently than I’d like
When did this happen?