• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The FBI loooooves themselves some honeypots.

    Why go catch criminals when you can set up some links/a token/whatever and they’ll come running to you and do the incriminating part themselves AND leave the logs of said activity in your possession?

    Much simpler!

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        To add more detail to the other reply, it’s only entrapment if they coerce you into doing something you wouldn’t have otherwise done.

        A cop comes up to you and goes ‘bro, lets go steal that car!’ would probably be entrapment.

        Cops putting a car on a street waiting for someone to steal it wouldn’t be.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          But this would be like a car that has the keys in the ignition and a sign making you aware of that fact.

          • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean, that’s basically what a trap car is, and those have been litigated to the point it’s very clear that it’s not entrapment and totally allowed.

            I mean you have to be kind of stupid to see an expensive car sitting there with the keys in the ignition and go ‘BRO! New ride!’, but ‘stupid’ isn’t a criminal defense (so far anyways) and nobody MAKES them get in the car, start it, and drive off.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Generally not. Entrapment is very specific, and leaving you the option of doing something illegal without pushing you to do it is decidedly not entrapment.