• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Are they any louder than any HDD from the last 30 years?

    If so, im actually curious why that is

    Edit: fixed to say HDD not SSD

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well I have no experience with these particular drives, but they do seem to have 11 platters. Which is beyond insane as far as I’m concerned. More platters means more moving parts, more friction more noise (all other things being equal).

    • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Oops, yes. I definitely would expect these to be much louder than your 6 GB 1998 model HDD wrangling under stress of copying files at 30 MB/s.

      • Onsotumenh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Tell that to my IBM 10GB 10.000 RPM U2W SCSI from back then. To this day I have never witnessed a noisier harddrive… But that PC was pretty epic, including the biggest mf of a mainboard I ever had (the SCSI controller was onboard).

        • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ah, the sound of turning on the SCSI storage tower.

          KA-TSCHONK. WeeeeeeeeEEEEEIIIIIII… skrrrt, skrrrt, clack.

          Either that or KA-TSCHONK, silence, if there were already too many boxes on that circuit at a lan party 😁

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Your everyday modern HDD does not much more than 60MB/s after the on-disk cache (a few GB) is full.