• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That way we can’t legally unionize. In the U.S. at least.

    This must vary state-by-state, or have exceptions, because I could name examples of them (but I would rather not dox myself).

    • Lexam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s not every company, but that is what mine did. We’re “management” but we don’t manage anyone.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Given how “business-friendly” the US has become, I imagine there are all sorts of loopholes that only work in favor of the corporation.

        • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There doesn’t need to be loopholes anymore. The SC will just blatantly rule in favor of companies.

          In case anyone has missed it, they’re done with loopholes, done with being sly and coy. They are saying the quiet parts, they are marching proudly, they are confident and unafraid. We need to make them afraid again.

          The right wing and its corporate masters are done hiding in shadow. Loopholes and subterfuge are for chumps when you can just change the rules without consequence.