• pathief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I often wonder how news websites are supposed to survive. People (myself included) want unbiased news websites without paywalls and ads.

    How are they supposed to pay their staff?

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Subscription models. Some sites even combine some free articles with it, so that anyone can look into their works, but not necessarily everything. If it fits you, you get a subscription. Sort of the same way people would pay for their daily newspaper.

      It can be argued that “news” should be free, and there are some news site that are basically picking up AP/AFP/whatever and repost these, but actual journalism do requires work.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m fine with ads when they don’t take up half my screen or try and shift the page to to trick me into clicking on them, should a stuck with sidebar adds.

    • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The honest answer are general fees like they are used for public broadcasters. It’s not a perfect system either and it requires significant effort to keep things neutral, but overall it seems to have the best results if you compare the quality of the outcome.

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Umm I was reading the comments, does nobody else go into the page’s HTML and delete the “pay now” popup. Usually deleting the code works for me. Let me know if you have a way that works for you!

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      That sounds like a lot of work. On sites where that work (which is not all of them, some are made by competent people), firefox “reading mode” just do the job.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      I’ve found this rarely works myself, due to them disabling other parts of the page, it’s less hassle to just find the article elsewhere

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I guess a lot of people have a strange aversion towards messing with the code of websites. Which is weird and dumb, it’s downloaded to your browser, it’s not running on their system, you’re free to mess with it as much as you want. Best to familiarize yourself with the Web developer tools, they can be an effective weapon against scammy sites which use deceptive methods like this.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Plus the worst thing that can happen is the webpage crashes, just hit reload and you’re back baby! It’s the safest environment to fuck around with code. A person would have to go out of their way to actually make a problem, maybe some random kid too. They get into everything.

    • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Sometimes the reading mode bypasses paywalls and popups.

      Also make sure to block “annoyances” in uBlock.

      For the rest, I’m using the Nuke Anything extension.

    • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Depends, some pages don’t actually load the full content. Removing the paywall pop-up doesn’t really work then.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        There are some websites you can use to avoid a paywall for a newspaper sites, sometimes even loading the otherwise hidden content when removing the paywall code or manually removing the paywall overlay using an ad blocker. I forgot the one I used to use, but I found a Reddit post about it.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Generally the first thing I try is to hit ESC to stop a paywall script from running.

      If that doesn’t work I try pressing ctrl-A ctrl-C to copy the whole page as soon as I see something. This works on pages that load and are then hidden by a script, but you have to be quick. Then I open Notepad and paste. If this doesn’t work I’ll either try it once more and see if I can be faster or just say screw it, if they want to hide their content that bad I don’t need it. If it’s important to me google will usually find the same news or info somewhere else.

    • newcockroach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I used to do that but it turns out ublock has a option for that!! When u click on the ublock plugin that is a thunder symbol option which u can use to delete any element on the page. 🙃

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I will try to unblock ads on a new site one time. I want to see the whole article on one page, No click-through gallery of 27 different takes. There can be ads in the borders and margins. And maybe if I’m feeling generous one in the middle of the content. I don’t want to see an unrelated pop-up video I don’t want to see every paragraph separated by another ad.

    If they can’t play nice I block the ads, If I can’t, by default, see the content without the ads, I’ll find the article on another service. Everyone’s literally just copying the same content back and forth with different wording.

    If I can’t see the content, and I can’t find it on another service, I’ll generally use bypass paywalls clean. If I can’t see it through that I don’t see it.

    I’m not giving in for this b******* ads all over the place scenario. You can’t even read a recipe page nowadays without an ad blocker.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Basically how I browse the internet these days … if I have to click on a bunch of stuff, sign up, register, accept a bunch of notifications, cookies, blah, blah, blah … all because I want to read 200 words on your dumb site … I’m not even going to bother with your site, skip and find a different source that is easier.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I go a step further and block them in DDG. This includes any “article” I have to scroll through to find the answer.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Get PopUpOFF and AdNauseam. Don’t just back down without a fight. If I need to read an article to find some information I am going to read it, dumb bullshit be damned, even if I have to break half your site to do so. I’ve even been spiteful enough to hack away at the page with inspect element if it still manages to get past those add-ons.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Generally for news websites … especially highly rated ones that are supposed to be the best professional outfits … if I can’t use ‘reader view’ and just read your copy … I’m skipping your site and never going back to you.

        All I want to do is read the news … you don’t need to sell me on a great refrigerator or a cigarette lighter that has a flame that can melt steel because I’m never going to buy it.

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          NoScript tends to break more things on the page than is desired, in my experience, I used to use it but eventually I got rid of it because of the hassle of “is this the one I should add an exception for to make it work? No. How about this one?” repeat until you figure it out, and then repeat the whole process for every website you ever use

          Using AdNauseam’s built-in uBlock, I can use its element picker if something is particularly stubborn

          Don’t get me wrong, I like NoScript as a concept and think it should exist for the subset of users who want that functionality, but it’s not for me.

    • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      My less tech savy younger family members have learned to completely ignore ads, wait for the skip button and effectively avoid all the false skip buttons on account of playing mobile games with ads since they were babies. Advertisers have perfected the human brain of people who rawdog the internet to be incapable of retaining any information from any ad they see and finding skip buttons wherever they may be.

      From my personal observational account, i think I’ve only seen boomers and some older millennials ever interacting with ads. A gen alpha’s brain wouldn’t even remember an ad they just saw. They have perfected filtering them.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Someday soon my “adblocker” might be a personal AI that reads the spam-ridden website on a virtual display in memory, identifies the actual content while pretending to look at whatever ads the site demands, and then passes the information I’m actually looking for along to me. Good luck captchaing that.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      І ԁоո’t раrtісulаrly thіոk thаt summаrіzеrs аrе а gооԁ gоаl, sіոсе аі summаrіеs саո оftеո bе wrоոg, mіsіոtеrрrеt іոfоrmаtіоո, оr оmіt іmроrtаոt іոfоrmаtіո thеy fаіl tо іԁеոtіfy аs іmроrtаոt.

      I think if that starts to become common people should start using tools like this as well as the use of pre-baked PDF or image rendered text to thwart it on their content.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      An AI feature actually useful for consumers? Corporate overloards say no thx, let’s instead fill the net with more AI-generated SEO bullshit

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s just fine as far as the site is concerned.

    They provide content that is paid for by ads. When you block the ads, you’re using up bandwidth and not contributing to the site’s revenue. They want you gone.

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Peak monetisation. Don’t let them even see the article [copied from another website and run through ChatGPT] until they fork over the entrance fee.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We want them gone. The market goes where the users use it. The Internet did not have the advertising presence it does now when it was conceived. Saying they want us gone means they are the only game in town. They aren’t. They are too big for their britches and need to realize the users dictate the usage.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Rose-colored glasses, dude.

        The internet was full of never-ending pop-ups that opened 2 more windows every time you closed one 25-30 years ago, and the viruses they carried fucked your computer to the point you had to do a clean Windows install. Spam.filters didn’t work and you’d get 500 unfiltered spam messages a day, and since you were on 28-56k using a POP3 system it took an hour to download them before you could sort through them.

        Shit’s bad now, but it was way, way worse back then.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The Internet did not have the advertising presence it does now when it was conceived.

        Do you mean back when it was only the government and universities connected to it, before the web existed? Those times were very different. Practically user was contributing to the internet some way, either through time (like actually creating the software to use it, and once the web existed, creating sites) or money.

        These days, there’s a significantly larger number of freeloaders that want everything for free, without contributing anything back. So far, advertising has been the only effective model to support such users that don’t want to pay.

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      At least you won’t use up that bandwidth routing traffic through pihole. You also get a nice cache for faster loading on frequented sites.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    It turns out the popular alternative is “force you to sign up (with a phone number) from critical mass/FOMO, track the snot out of you then slide ads in later.” Oh, and the stuff you want is siloed away until you join, and buried in a mountain of rambling and engagement optimization junk.

    Note that I’m largely talking about Discord, which is unfortunately where many of my interests have been shunted off to. People talk about Facebook, Google and OpenAI eating the internet, but I feel like Discord is the quiet trojan horse.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Discord is 1000x worse because entire communities have taken to moving onto there. It’s like the one thing that’s worse than moving everything to Reddit: people using a fancy chat service like a forum. Everything from hardware to games seems to have most of the community on Discord; incredibly unhelpful if I’m trying to troubleshoot something.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          It’s unbelievavly time inefficient for… anything.

          And its incredibly engaging. I burnt through so much time shooting the breeze in hopes of actually finding something interesting, notification spam, checking channels… It’s why I deleted it from everywhere. And it left a gaping hole in my life, because its the only place some niche communities exist now.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Isn’t this just the system working as intended? You gain benefit from the content of a website and the people who make the content get compensated via ad revenue. If you choose to not provide them with ad revenue, you don’t get the benefit of the content. It’s basically the same as walking into a store and choosing not to buy a product on the shelf. You’re not “getting yours” by not buying something, you’re getting nothing and paying nothing, zero benefit for zero cost.

    • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The web, “as intended,” worked for several years with utterly no ad content. And when ads did start coming along, they were largely innocuous; little things in side bars, not obnoxious full-page videos that are rarely dismissible.

      Anyone who tries to sell you on the idea that the web was designed for commerce or as a way to distribute anything other than information is a lying fucker.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I knew about ad blockers before I started using one. Small sidebar or header ads weren’t really enough to convince me I needed one.

        Now the Internet has so many popups, ads, aggressive video players, requests to accept cookies, all because some people figured out how to make websites more profitable by making them worse. It’s sad, really. The Internet of old was great.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Don’t know if that’s true. People invested in it as a bubble - knowing that someday the companies running sites within them would be worth trillions. And they were right (though not about which ones would be worth that)

        I remember seeing a lot of dinky banner ads back in the day.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Is your point that technology should never be used for anything other than what it was originally designed for? If that’s the case then please stop using TCP/IP for anything other than advancing US military weapons research.

    • archonet@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This is exactly why I choose to persevere with ad-blocking addons and make their website work the way I want it to without dumb bullshit getting in my way. :D

      If you want people to use your website, make your website usable with unobtrusive ads or I’ll make it usable for me, and you won’t see a dime of ad revenue. Unfortunately, most sites seem to just double down (which doesn’t work because it just makes ad-blocking even more necessary and popular). Sucks for them.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you want people to use your website,

        Why do you assume that’s the end goal? Pretty sure their goal is to get paid. The website is a means to deliver content to people. If we’re talking about news sites, then I think they’d prefer people buy a newspaper. But since they have to have a website they need to figure out a way to make some money or they’re going to get laid off.

        Sucks for them.

        Well if we’re all having this attitude, then why should anyone care about your preferences for no ads? You’ve taken the low ground and anyone can now say “Sucks for you” if you don’t like seeing ads.

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Why do you assume that’s the end goal? Pretty sure their goal is to get paid.

          … and they get paid by…

          people using their website. More specifically viewing ads while using their website. The kicker is (and I thought I explained this), the more obtrusive they make their ads, the more people use an ad blocker, and the less people will see their ads. I thought I covered that well enough, but apparently not for you.

          But since they have to have a website they need to figure out a way to make some money or they’re going to get laid off.

          If they can’t figure out how to make money without their website being obnoxious and nigh-unusable, then indeed perhaps it’s time they found a new line of work, methinks.

          Well if we’re all having this attitude, then why should anyone care about your preferences for no ads?

          Did I ever claim that anyone cared about my preferences? It’s pretty obvious from the fact I said “most sites seem to double down”, that I acknowledge most websites already don’t give a shit and would rather squeeze as much as possible from the few people not running ad blockers than make the web a better and more usable place for everyone. They very clearly do not care about that, which is very amusing to me, as it means ad-blocking software will continue to improve and outpace shit web developers, as it’s so popular and needed. Which sucks for them, that they’re shooting themselves in the foot.

          Ya followin’ me, sport?

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t know how people who block ads are so delusional to think that these websites would be sad to see them go, any more than shops would be sad to see shoplifters take their business elsewhere.

      I get why some people might block ads but don’t kid yourselves, you’re blocking the only revenue stream for most sites and it doesn’t cost you anything. I’m not taking about tracking of course, sites that track you can get fucked.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m not taking about tracking of course, sites that track you can get fucked.

        That’s essentially every single website that runs ads. The tracking is in the ads.

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I was trying to do a meme but it didn’t format :( I was going to say “do you want to continue without supporting us?” and put in a “you’re god damn right” breaking bad meme but I goofed it.