• shrodes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I wonder how much of this correlates with the rise of intimacy coordinators. I’m sure there are productions that think it’s not worth the investment so they just scrap the scene and have it take place off camera etc.

    And perhaps a rise in actors not wanting to have their stuff on the internet forever now (even more so with the rise of AI training)

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      I think it correlates more strongly to the prevalence of pornography. Mainstream movie scenes look fake and contrived, because they are. As unrealistic as pornography is, that is actually a dick, and it is actually going in a vagina.

      When your mainstream movie sex scene is going to be compared (unfavorably) to a scene of two people actually fucking, why bother even shooting it?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I think this only happens because sex is as fake as most other emotions in today’s movies.

        I also hate how everything is glossy, even character faces. Even fear, blood and shit are glossy.

        FFS, old Hollywood with exceptionally cute actors on main roles still would have a bit of that noble mess around, chaotic here and there and in conversations. Good 3d artists know that you need some chaos in everything distinguishable in your scenes or they will look fake.

        It’s rather that fake-looking sex scenes in movies don’t feel like art, they feel like porn without satisfaction. So nobody bothers.

        While fixing that culture would require changing the environment around film making. You know, the one forming the demand for bore and glossiness.