Google’s AI-driven Search Generative Experience have been generating results that are downright weird and evil, ie slavery’s positives.

  • Womble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That really bad for a modern consumer economy yes. But those werent a thing before the industrial revolution. Before that the large majority of people were subsitance/tennant farmer or serfs who consumed basically nothing other than food and fuel in winter. Thats what a slave based economy was an alternantive to. Its also why slvery died out in the 19th century, it no longer fit the times.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There being more slaves now then ever is heavily disputed. There is also the fact that was little more than a billion people in the world when the trans-Atlantic slave trade stopped, so there would have to be 8 times as many for slavery to be as prevalent.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, I agree, our per capita slave figure has to be much lower these days, mathematically speaking.

          Even one slave is a slave too many, and knowing there are still so many (whatever figure we put it at) is heartbreaking.

          Things like the cocoa plantation slaves and the slave fishing ships have people kidnapped and forced to work for nothing. Actual slavery by any definition.

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course, when I said it died out I didn’t mean slavery was entirely gone and doesn’t exist at all. I mean it died out as a prevalent societal structure.

            100s of people in slavery on a cocoa plantation is of course awful, but it shouldn’t obscure the fact that there used to be vast swathes of land where slaves outnumbered free people and their children were born into bondage - that is what has died out.

            • livus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I understand your wider point and I agree with it.

              But I think the point I was making actually supposts what you were saying upthread.

              The agrarian model of the cocoa industry is economically reliant on slavery. 2.1 million children labour on those plantations in Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire, and a significant number have been trafficked or forced.

    • Bjornir
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And isn’t the economy much better now than before the industrial revolution?

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Obviously, but my point was that slaves weren’t economically terrible in an agrarian peasant/serf economy, which everywhere was before the industrial revolution.