Privacy advocates got access to Locate X, a phone tracking tool which multiple U.S. agencies have bought access to, and showed me and other journalists exactly what it was capable of. Tracking a phone from one state to another to an abortion clinic. Multiple places of worship. A school. Following a likely juror to a residence. And all of this tracking is possible without a warrant, and instead just a few clicks of a mouse.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Or, you know, let the gov work for you, not against you, & fully expect people to get jailed if they thank you.

    It’s a matter of perspective what the minimum standard should be.

    Especially when a personal device like a phone is basically necessary for a normal life and even public services.

      • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        Unfortunately yes, and I would go even a step further and say a smart phone is a basic necessity. More and more companies and even government services are operating on the assumption that everyone has a smart phone. I have encountered various services where if a person didn’t have a smart phone they literally can’t use it. I even have personal experience with it.

        My landlord uses a company for payments that can only be interacted with via an app on a smart phone. There is no web portal option. There is no option to mail a check. There is no option to setup a direct bank transfer. I was essentially strong armed into it since the place itself was (and still is) better than almost anything else I saw and is a reasonable price.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yes, imho, and increasingly so.
        In an environment where the vast majority has one people act like everyone has one (eg restaurants having qr links to menus).

        Even EU ruled as much (eg my company phone is my own personal device regardless of ownership & my privacy is protected differently than eg my work PC or laptop).

        And even if this wasn’t the case, why would you need to opt out of having a mobile phone just to get basic privacy?

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You can answer this yourself. Get rid of your phone and see. If you beleive it’s not a necessity, don’t say “yeah I could do these alternative things to get by”. Actually do it. I hope you’re not job-shopping

        • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          The above being a rhetorical question, I just wanted to take a temperature of the room.

          I have lived without a phone pretty much all my adult life. The experiment for me would be to get a phone and see what changes. In that way, I have answered it for myself and the answer is a clear “you don’t need a phone”.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, the impact on quality of life is just so significant that it’s a handicap to normal daily lives.