• yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Semantics. A podcast is and was something that was typically long format akin to a talk show - that was something that could be listened to without requiring you to watch it. It is not audio exclusive. Many radio shows may and do have video feeds but that does not prevent them from being called radio shows.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Many radio shows may and do have video feeds but that does not prevent them from being called radio shows.

      Nor does it prevent it from being a podcast. What prevents it being a podcast is not being distributed as a podcast…

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Again semantics. You are attempting to split hairs based on distribution opposed to type. This is like being a pedant over someone referring to tissues as a Kleenex despite it not being that particular brand. Podcasts were ambiguous back when they were still new, too.

        Shoutcast servers were/hosted digital broadcasts. Podcasts were containerized (aka offline) recordings of these. You could argue that calling a live show a podcast is technically incorrect: but thanks to language continuing to adapt to its environment… You’d actually just be out of date or misinformed.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 minutes ago

          You are attempting to split hairs based on distribution

          This is not semantics. This is not “splitting hairs”. This is not pedantic. How it’s distributed is a fundamental property of what a podcast is.

          If it’s not, maybe you can tell me what a podcast is, and how it’s different from a YouTube video?

          You could argue that calling a live show a podcast is technically incorrect:

          …why would I do that?

          but thanks to language continuing to adapt to its environment…

          This is not “language adaptation”, this is a complete erosion of the meaning of the word.

          We have words for videos, they’re called “videos”, which are fundamentally different from a “podcast”.

          Podcasts were containerized (aka offline) recordings of these.

          Podcast are not necessarily offline. You can stream them.