• SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    But it does. Cigarettes were healthy and climate change didn’t exist 50 years ago

    • Antiproton
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There was never any science saying “cigarettes are healthy”.

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Neither of those things were backed by science. Confusing convincing lobbying with science is a problem today was it was then.

    • Draconic NEO@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.

      • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible.

        There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge.

        Science has always changed, just like human culture did

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.