Alternative Title: “Bluesky pretty sure these leopards won’t eat their face.”

  • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The aggregator is called the Relay, and I haven’t even found anything suggesting one could realistically selfhost it. Then you need to handle the massive stream of data coming through it with AppViews, which are tough to handle too (there are a few but not many iirc).

    That said, I am also impressed with the thought behind ATProtocol. It seems much more robust and defined than ActivityPub.

      • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That link doesn’t work for me, but I ended up finding a post by them that seems to correspond. Good to know, thanks! Seems like it’s realistic but expensive still (150$/mo?), and it’s not gonna get cheaper… I hope they figure out a way to make them less centralized.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      defined

      That’s probably because they built a protocol specifically for a usecase, rather than building a protocol and hoping that someone will come along with a usecase.

      • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        My understanding was that activitypub was basically a rough formalization of existing protocols, designed to be as flexible as possible. More a template than a real protocol. Unfortunately mastodon’s popularity basically made a bunch of things de-facto obligatory but not well documented, and there’s still a bunch of ways to do… anything.