• blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Last time I tried it it was a much worse experience than Emby across all devices and for all media types. I don’t understand all the love it gets.

    • allywilson@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Worse how? Jellyfin was forked from Emby, and since then has continued to improve in my eyes.

      • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It was forked but somehow lacked a huge amount of functionality that Emby had (and still has) Like I think it only supported films, not music or TV shows. The app infrastructure was awful across fire stick, Roku and android and wasn’t backward compatible with the Emby apps. I just didn’t see the point of forking it if you’re just going to make it worse or only address the server side and neglect the clients. The whole thing has to work together with good clients and server.

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Looks like you need a closer view about actual functionality. Jellyfin supports movies, tv-shows, music (there are also apps just for music), e-books and live-tv.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s free and open source. That alone is a big plus. And it works fairly well. What does emby do better, that warrants paying $120 for it?

        • accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          As I need hardware transcoding, that makes emby immediately non viable for me. I also usually watch via various apps and on tv, which, if you don’t have emby premiere are also not free to use.