Oh, cool, Iāll remember this if Trump wins and weāre in line for the camps together.
You should probably resist that with something direct. Maybe some action.
Okay. Letās go with that analogy. With the choice of a stab wound or a .50 cal through the chest, which is preferable? Which will give you more time to deal with the problem?
None so long as you keep giving thumbs up for the guy stabbing you because theyāre not using a .50 cal.
You thinkā¦ the USā¦ is more fascist now than it was in the 70s. Or the 50s. Or the 30s. Or the 10s.
Ye. They were bigoted as fuck, sure. But they were not actively, blatantly as fascist as they are now.
My guy, Iām a fucking near-sighted cripple with a history of depression and suicide attempts. Iām not going to overwhelm any government goons with my elite hand-to-hand skills, trusting me with a gun in the long term will likely end up with my own brains splattered on the walls, and Iām not going to outshoot anyone when Iām recruited for the anarchist militia.
Have you considered maybe that NOT letting the state fall to the point where itās erecting death camps might be a good idea?
None so long as you keep giving thumbs up for the guy stabbing you because theyāre not using a .50 cal.
So which kills you faster? Being stabbed repeatedly, or being shot with a .50 cal repeatedly?
Youāre continuously avoiding this because you know damn well that āKilling yourself fasterā IS less desirable than āKilling yourself slowerā, even using the assumptions in your own argument.
Ye. They were bigoted as fuck, sure. But they were not actively, blatantly as fascist as they are now.
Holy fuck. Jesus H. Christ. Do you have any idea just how much more authoritarian the US was in years past!?
My guy, Iām a fucking near-sighted cripple with a history of depression and suicide attempts. Iām not going to overwhelm any government goons with my elite hand-to-hand skills, trusting me with a gun in the long term will likely end up with my own brains splattered on the walls, and Iām not going to outshoot anyone when Iām recruited for the anarchist militia.
Thereās plenty of things to do that is not about fighting government goons. Direct action doesnāt mean ātake a rifle and fightā. It means supporting your fellow humans directly, instead of sending politicians letters and hoping they will actually listen to you.
If you wait until youāre led to the camps to start thinking about doing anything other than voting, then itās (probably) too late.
Have you considered maybe that NOT letting the state fall to the point where itās erecting death camps might be a good idea?
The only thing that will prevent that is knowing people will actively resist that.
4 years ago you might have argued with me instead: āHave you considered maybe that NOT letting the state fall to the point where itās conducting genocide might be a good idea?ā
And it would have sounded just as convincing. You can always think of the next worst thing though once fascism is there. Maybe in 4 years youāll be telling me that I should vote for trans-genocide so that LGB can at least survive. Who knowsā¦
Youāre continuously avoiding this because you know damn well that āKilling yourself fasterā IS less desirable than āKilling yourself slowerā, even using the assumptions in your own argument.
Not at all. I keep telling you that you need to fight to not get stabbed or shot and you keep going āBut if I donāt choose the knife, they might pull out a gun.ā Instead of asking yourself āwhy the fuck am I ever bothering to consider whether a knife or gun is faster at killing me instead of trying to stop the killerā. Voting for the tools of your destruction is you accepting that your killer has your support to keep killing you.
Holy fuck. Jesus H. Christ. Do you have any idea just how much more authoritarian the US was in years past!?
Authoritarian? sure. Bigoted? Certainly. But it wasnāt actively fascist.
Let me ask you a different question. When is it enough? Is there any point, any government action which will convince you that you need to put your efforts into doing something other than voting? Is that point only when youāre personally being led to the pit?
Thereās plenty of things to do that is not about fighting government goons. Direct action doesnāt mean ātake a rifle and fightā. It means supporting your fellow humans directly, instead of sending politicians letters and hoping they will actually listen to you.
When weāre at the point where people are being rounded up for death camps, Iām pretty sure that āsupporting my fellow humansā isnāt whatās going to keep me out of the camps.
If you wait until youāre led to the camps to start thinking about doing anything other than voting, then itās (probably) too late.
If you insist on ceding all levers of power to fascists except those which are sufficiently āpureā in your eyes, your society will be led to the camps much faster.
4 years ago you might have argued with me instead: āHave you considered maybe that NOT letting the state fall to the point where itās conducting genocide might be a good idea?ā
Four years ago we were supporting Israel, which was conducting genocide then as surely as it is now, and with much broader support for its genocide in the US population. Go back eight years, and itās even worse. 20 years, the numbers are horrific.
The state hasnāt āfallenā to this point. That weāre even having this discussion on the national stage is a sign of the changing times, sad as that is.
And it would have sounded just as convincing. You can always think of the next worst thing though once fascism is there. Maybe in 4 years youāll be telling me that I should vote for trans-genocide so that LGB can at least survive. Who knowsā¦
Oh, like how LGBT rights have been on the decline in the past half-century because of what incredible speed weāre descending into fascism from, right?
Holy shit, you have to be at least near my age. You canāt possibly confuse the state of our youth with conditions now.
Not at all. I keep telling you that you need to fight to not get stabbed or shot and you keep going āBut if I donāt choose the knife, they might pull out a gun.ā Instead of asking yourself āwhy the fuck am I ever bothering to consider whether a knife or gun is faster at killing me instead of trying to stop the killerā.
Because dying slower gives you more time to stop the killer. Dying quicker does nothing.
Authoritarian? sure. Bigoted? Certainly. But it wasnāt actively fascist.
ā¦
Would you like to outline to me the conditions that are fascist now that were not equally or more āfascistā, in your view, back then?
Let me ask you a different question. When is it enough? Is there any point, any government action which will convince you that you need to put your efforts into doing something other than voting? Is that point only when youāre personally being led to the pit?
My guy, Iām entirely in support of people forming orgs for voluntary association and organization outside of state power. But you also have to reckon with the fact that state power is immense currently, that non-state actors are not in a strong position currently, and that state power has the capacity to become much more repressive than it is currently.
My message is not āVote, and only vote, or only do government-approved political actionsā. My message is āFor fuckās sake, AT LEAST vote against fascism, if for no other reason than getting fascism quicker helps NO ONEā
You want to talk long-term plans? Iām game. You want to talk creating counterbalances to state power through trade unions, syndicates, communes, self-defense organizations? Iām game to talk. But none of that contradicts āDo not let those who want the state to become WORSE into powerā or āFascism is BAD for organizingā.
When weāre at the point where people are being rounded up for death camps, Iām pretty sure that āsupporting my fellow humansā isnāt whatās going to keep me out of the camps.
Indeed. Which is why I suggest you start doing it earlier.
If you insist on ceding all levers of power to fascists except those which are sufficiently āpureā in your eyes, your society will be led to the camps much faster.
I aināt ceding shit. The only thing fascists and capitalists fear is power from below. It doesnāt matter how many ālevels of powerā they hold when guillotines are being erected.
Four years ago we were supporting Israel, which was conducting genocide then as surely as it is now, and with much broader support for its genocide in the US population. Go back eight years, and itās even worse. 20 years, the numbers are horrific.
No, back then there was plenty of plausible paths away from this for those who choose to believe in parliamentarism. We are now in a masks-off territory. US exterminating natives style. And yet parliamentarians still say voting works.
Oh, like how LGBT rights have been on the decline in the past half-century because of what incredible speed weāre descending into fascism from, right?
Funny you should mention this., Do you know that pre-nazi germany had pretty good Trans-rights? Did you know that early revolutionary USSR had great gay rights? Itās funny if you think about how reactionary movements work, huh?
Because dying slower gives you more time to stop the killer. Dying quicker does nothing.
Youāre not stopping the killer though. Youāre just voting that they use the knife instead of the gun.
Would you like to outline to me the conditions that are fascist now that were not equally or more āfascistā, in your view, back then?
My guy, Nixon resigned voluntarily from a scandal. You think this is how fascists act?
My message is not āVote, and only vote, or only do government-approved political actionsā. My message is āFor fuckās sake, AT LEAST vote against fascism, if for no other reason than getting fascism quicker helps NO ONEā
You didnāt answer my question. At which point will you admit that voting didnāt work? Only just before the firing squad?
Indeed. Which is why I suggest you start doing it earlier.
Cool, I have a week and a half before the election. What direct action can I take to keep myself out of the camps, since voting is no longer pure enough for my high-minded ideology?
I aināt ceding shit. The only thing fascists and capitalists fear is power from below. It doesnāt matter how many ālevels of powerā they hold when guillotines are being erected.
ā¦
Do you remember how the guillotines were erected?
Do you think they were just magicked into existence?
Funny you should mention this., Do you know that pre-nazi germany had pretty good Trans-rights?
You would think this would be a point in favor of not letting the state fall into fascism, even considering that Weimar Germany was far from trans-friendly and banned trans-related materials from the Institute for Sexual Science from being distributed.
Did you know that early revolutionary USSR had great gay rights? Itās funny if you think about how reactionary movements work, huh?
Again, this would seem like a really good reason to not allow fascism to take over the state.
No, back then there was plenty of plausible paths away from this for those who choose to believe in parliamentarism. We are now in a masks-off territory. US exterminating natives style. And yet parliamentarians still say voting works.
What was the plausible path away from this with a rabidly pro-Israel US public, again?
My guy, Nixon resigned voluntarily from a scandal. You think this is how fascists act?
Nixon resigned only after his own party told him the political fallout would be too great for them to bother backing him.
Are we really going on the position that Nixon wasnāt fascist as fuck? Iād like to be clear on the matter, since you havenāt specified any actual issues.
Youāre not stopping the killer though. Youāre just voting that they use the knife instead of the gun.
Yes, which buys me more time to act against him.
It takes next to nothing to ensure the killer uses the knife instead of the gun. Yet you insist that the only moral option is to let the killer choose his own weapon, and then nobly martyr yourself on the .50 cal and call it resistance.
You didnāt answer my question. At which point will you admit that voting didnāt work? Only just before the firing squad?
What criteria are you putting here for voting not working? As Iāve already outlined that fascism will come quicker without participation of left-elements in voting, and your only response has been āYes, well, youāre still dying slowlyā, Iām not really sure youāre āgettingā what ābuying timeā means.
Cool, I have a week and a half before the election. What direct action can I take to keep myself out of the camps, since voting is no longer pure enough for my high-minded ideology?
You think the camps are opening straight after the election? Come on, this takes time.
As for action, anything which is available to you. Even providing sysadmin support for orgs would be something one can do.
Do you remember how the guillotines were erected?
Do you think they were just magicked into existence?
Not quite sure what point youāre trying to make against my analogy here.
You would think this would be a point in favor of not letting the state fall into fascism, even considering that Weimar Germany was far from trans-friendly and banned trans-related materials from the Institute for Sexual Science from being distributed.
The point I am making is that thereās always progress and reaction growing together in capitalism due to the increasing inequality. The fact that progress is happening doesnāt mean the society isnāt growing more and more fascist.
What was the plausible path away from this with a rabidly pro-Israel US public, again?
What does that have to do with the point I was making?
Again, this would seem like a really good reason to not allow fascism to take over the state.
You realize those gay rights came from below against the wishes of then, state? Much like the gay and civil rights came from below in the USA against the wishes of the state and capital? Funny how only direct action keeps getting the goods, innit?
Nixon resigned only after his own party told him the political fallout would be too great for them to bother backing him.
Are we really going on the position that Nixon wasnāt fascist as fuck? Iād like to be clear on the matter, since you havenāt specified any actual issues.
It doesnāt matter if Nixon would love to be a dictator. It matters if society was ready to accept fascism, which USA wasnāt back then, but is now.
Yes, which buys me more time to act against him.
It also legitimizes your stabbing, since you voted for it. So why would anyone help you stop it. And anyway, you donāt have any plan to stop it.
It takes next to nothing to ensure the killer uses the knife instead of the gun. Yet you insist that the only moral option is to let the killer choose his own weapon, and then nobly martyr yourself on the .50 cal and call it resistance.
One has to ask themselves, why would the killer actually give you a choice in the matter. What is the benefit to the killer to killing you slowly. This is the question you donāt want to face.
What criteria are you putting here for voting not working?
Is your society doing genocide when it wasnāt before? Is your society on the threshold of masks-off fascism when it wasnāt before? Is inequality increasing or decreasing? Are working class peopleās lives improving or not? You know the answers to all these, but you choose to limit yourself in thinking that things were somehow improving because some things were getting better.
You think the camps are opening straight after the election? Come on, this takes time.
Okay. What direct action can I take to keep me out of the camps between now and Trump coming into power?
As for action, anything which is available to you. Even providing sysadmin support for orgs would be something one can do.
That would strengthen the orgs, which is a good thing to do.
It would not keep me out of the camps unless you have some delusion that American society is going to make a 180 based on my actions in the next few months.
Affecting change takes years. Generations. Which is why itās important to fight for change now, and why itās important to buy ourselves that time to fight for it.
Not quite sure what point youāre trying to make against my analogy here.
The executions of the French Revolution were enabled by the capture of the state apparatus. Control of the state is absolutely a useful tool, and rejecting democracy as a means of acquiring control, or denying enemies control, is nothing short of foolishness. And certainly the French Revolution didnāt occur all in a moment. Revolution is only as powerful as the opinions backing it - right now, what do you see in the American people as regarding opinions towards your ideology? You really think youāve got a shot right now?
Make the vote. Itās a day of your fucking life, at most. It buys you extra years to build what you need to build; to educate who you need to educate.
Donāt let fascism win because of apathy towards who controls the state. Who controls the state is important, even if you donāt like that it is.
The point I am making is that thereās always progress and reaction growing together in capitalism due to the increasing inequality. The fact that progress is happening doesnāt mean the society isnāt growing more and more fascist.
So by that logic, society has been getting more fascist effectively every day since the 17th century, correct?
Is your society doing genocide when it wasnāt before?
My society isnāt doing genocide when it wasnāt before. It remains backing a genocidal ethnostate. It was backing a genocidal ethnostate before. It was backing a genocidal ethnostate since before I was born. Funny enough, my society was doing genocide itself, and not that long ago - but thatās no longer occurring. Are we less fascist?
Is your society on the threshold of masks-off fascism when it wasnāt before?
ā¦ how can that be a criteria for fascism? Thatās recursive.
Is inequality increasing or decreasing?
Increased slightly in the US - GINI increased from 36ish to 40ish.
Are working class peopleās lives improving or not?
Yes, absolutely. That peopleās lives are not improving enough is a different issue.
You know the answers to all these, but you choose to limit yourself in thinking that things were somehow improving because some things were getting better.
Youāre operating from the axiom that society is getting more fascist continually, despite the logical absurdity of that considering both US and world history, and the mechanisms youāve proposed, and are desperately searching for evidence to back that up, instead of the reverse. Evidence should shape your opinion; your opinions should not shape the evidence you accept.
What does that have to do with the point I was making?
That there was no plausible path away, contrary to your claim?
You keep asserting there is a path away without the groundwork being lain.
You realize those gay rights came from below against the wishes of then, state?
What rights did they get against the wishes of the state, again?
Much like the gay and civil rights came from below in the USA against the wishes of the state and capital?
ā¦ you do remember where most gay rights progress happened in this country, right?
Funny how only direct action keeps getting the goods, innit?
Oh, I wasnāt aware direct action was what elected numerous liberal state legislatures and appointed liberal justices to the Supreme Court, silly me. I thought they were elected or something. Silly me. I guess we are living in an anarchist commune, contrary to my initial beliefs.
It doesnāt matter if Nixon would love to be a dictator. It matters if society was ready to accept fascism, which USA wasnāt back then, but is now.
So fascism is when the dictator is untouchable. Thatās the only criteria for fascism. Great. Guess Pinochet wasnāt a fascist either.
It also legitimizes your stabbing, since you voted for it. So why would anyone help you stop it.
This is the same stupid spiritual approach to politics that MLs spout. Sorry for being too much of a sinner for the anarchists to let into heaven.
And anyway, you donāt have any plan to stop it.
ā¦ because I advocate for voting for the knifeā¦ I have no plan to stop it.
Okay. Thanks for being a mind-reader, but apparently not a text-reader where I advocating for the creation and strengthening of alternate bases of power to the state.
One has to ask themselves, why would the killer actually give you a choice in the matter. What is the benefit to the killer to killing you slowly. This is the question you donāt want to face.
Because the metaphor falls apart when you start asking questions of motivation, because the state is not some single satanic entity for your paragnosticism to oppose. The state consists of numerous and opposing forces, many of which can be played against each other, and most of whom do not share goals. Itās the same delusion as treating ācapitalā as one thinking, malicious class entity instead of a disparate group of interests - something even fucking Stalin recognized the absurdity of.
You should probably resist that with something direct. Maybe some action.
None so long as you keep giving thumbs up for the guy stabbing you because theyāre not using a .50 cal.
Ye. They were bigoted as fuck, sure. But they were not actively, blatantly as fascist as they are now.
My guy, Iām a fucking near-sighted cripple with a history of depression and suicide attempts. Iām not going to overwhelm any government goons with my elite hand-to-hand skills, trusting me with a gun in the long term will likely end up with my own brains splattered on the walls, and Iām not going to outshoot anyone when Iām recruited for the anarchist militia.
Have you considered maybe that NOT letting the state fall to the point where itās erecting death camps might be a good idea?
So which kills you faster? Being stabbed repeatedly, or being shot with a .50 cal repeatedly?
Youāre continuously avoiding this because you know damn well that āKilling yourself fasterā IS less desirable than āKilling yourself slowerā, even using the assumptions in your own argument.
Holy fuck. Jesus H. Christ. Do you have any idea just how much more authoritarian the US was in years past!?
Thereās plenty of things to do that is not about fighting government goons. Direct action doesnāt mean ātake a rifle and fightā. It means supporting your fellow humans directly, instead of sending politicians letters and hoping they will actually listen to you.
If you wait until youāre led to the camps to start thinking about doing anything other than voting, then itās (probably) too late.
The only thing that will prevent that is knowing people will actively resist that.
4 years ago you might have argued with me instead: āHave you considered maybe that NOT letting the state fall to the point where itās conducting genocide might be a good idea?ā
And it would have sounded just as convincing. You can always think of the next worst thing though once fascism is there. Maybe in 4 years youāll be telling me that I should vote for trans-genocide so that LGB can at least survive. Who knowsā¦
Not at all. I keep telling you that you need to fight to not get stabbed or shot and you keep going āBut if I donāt choose the knife, they might pull out a gun.ā Instead of asking yourself āwhy the fuck am I ever bothering to consider whether a knife or gun is faster at killing me instead of trying to stop the killerā. Voting for the tools of your destruction is you accepting that your killer has your support to keep killing you.
Authoritarian? sure. Bigoted? Certainly. But it wasnāt actively fascist.
Let me ask you a different question. When is it enough? Is there any point, any government action which will convince you that you need to put your efforts into doing something other than voting? Is that point only when youāre personally being led to the pit?
When weāre at the point where people are being rounded up for death camps, Iām pretty sure that āsupporting my fellow humansā isnāt whatās going to keep me out of the camps.
If you insist on ceding all levers of power to fascists except those which are sufficiently āpureā in your eyes, your society will be led to the camps much faster.
Four years ago we were supporting Israel, which was conducting genocide then as surely as it is now, and with much broader support for its genocide in the US population. Go back eight years, and itās even worse. 20 years, the numbers are horrific.
The state hasnāt āfallenā to this point. That weāre even having this discussion on the national stage is a sign of the changing times, sad as that is.
Oh, like how LGBT rights have been on the decline in the past half-century because of what incredible speed weāre descending into fascism from, right?
Holy shit, you have to be at least near my age. You canāt possibly confuse the state of our youth with conditions now.
Because dying slower gives you more time to stop the killer. Dying quicker does nothing.
ā¦
Would you like to outline to me the conditions that are fascist now that were not equally or more āfascistā, in your view, back then?
My guy, Iām entirely in support of people forming orgs for voluntary association and organization outside of state power. But you also have to reckon with the fact that state power is immense currently, that non-state actors are not in a strong position currently, and that state power has the capacity to become much more repressive than it is currently.
My message is not āVote, and only vote, or only do government-approved political actionsā. My message is āFor fuckās sake, AT LEAST vote against fascism, if for no other reason than getting fascism quicker helps NO ONEā
You want to talk long-term plans? Iām game. You want to talk creating counterbalances to state power through trade unions, syndicates, communes, self-defense organizations? Iām game to talk. But none of that contradicts āDo not let those who want the state to become WORSE into powerā or āFascism is BAD for organizingā.
Indeed. Which is why I suggest you start doing it earlier.
I aināt ceding shit. The only thing fascists and capitalists fear is power from below. It doesnāt matter how many ālevels of powerā they hold when guillotines are being erected.
No, back then there was plenty of plausible paths away from this for those who choose to believe in parliamentarism. We are now in a masks-off territory. US exterminating natives style. And yet parliamentarians still say voting works.
Funny you should mention this., Do you know that pre-nazi germany had pretty good Trans-rights? Did you know that early revolutionary USSR had great gay rights? Itās funny if you think about how reactionary movements work, huh?
Youāre not stopping the killer though. Youāre just voting that they use the knife instead of the gun.
My guy, Nixon resigned voluntarily from a scandal. You think this is how fascists act?
You didnāt answer my question. At which point will you admit that voting didnāt work? Only just before the firing squad?
Cool, I have a week and a half before the election. What direct action can I take to keep myself out of the camps, since voting is no longer pure enough for my high-minded ideology?
ā¦
Do you remember how the guillotines were erected?
Do you think they were just magicked into existence?
You would think this would be a point in favor of not letting the state fall into fascism, even considering that Weimar Germany was far from trans-friendly and banned trans-related materials from the Institute for Sexual Science from being distributed.
Again, this would seem like a really good reason to not allow fascism to take over the state.
What was the plausible path away from this with a rabidly pro-Israel US public, again?
Nixon resigned only after his own party told him the political fallout would be too great for them to bother backing him.
Are we really going on the position that Nixon wasnāt fascist as fuck? Iād like to be clear on the matter, since you havenāt specified any actual issues.
Yes, which buys me more time to act against him.
It takes next to nothing to ensure the killer uses the knife instead of the gun. Yet you insist that the only moral option is to let the killer choose his own weapon, and then nobly martyr yourself on the .50 cal and call it resistance.
What criteria are you putting here for voting not working? As Iāve already outlined that fascism will come quicker without participation of left-elements in voting, and your only response has been āYes, well, youāre still dying slowlyā, Iām not really sure youāre āgettingā what ābuying timeā means.
You think the camps are opening straight after the election? Come on, this takes time.
As for action, anything which is available to you. Even providing sysadmin support for orgs would be something one can do.
Not quite sure what point youāre trying to make against my analogy here.
The point I am making is that thereās always progress and reaction growing together in capitalism due to the increasing inequality. The fact that progress is happening doesnāt mean the society isnāt growing more and more fascist.
What does that have to do with the point I was making?
You realize those gay rights came from below against the wishes of then, state? Much like the gay and civil rights came from below in the USA against the wishes of the state and capital? Funny how only direct action keeps getting the goods, innit?
It doesnāt matter if Nixon would love to be a dictator. It matters if society was ready to accept fascism, which USA wasnāt back then, but is now.
It also legitimizes your stabbing, since you voted for it. So why would anyone help you stop it. And anyway, you donāt have any plan to stop it.
One has to ask themselves, why would the killer actually give you a choice in the matter. What is the benefit to the killer to killing you slowly. This is the question you donāt want to face.
Is your society doing genocide when it wasnāt before? Is your society on the threshold of masks-off fascism when it wasnāt before? Is inequality increasing or decreasing? Are working class peopleās lives improving or not? You know the answers to all these, but you choose to limit yourself in thinking that things were somehow improving because some things were getting better.
Okay. What direct action can I take to keep me out of the camps between now and Trump coming into power?
That would strengthen the orgs, which is a good thing to do.
It would not keep me out of the camps unless you have some delusion that American society is going to make a 180 based on my actions in the next few months.
Affecting change takes years. Generations. Which is why itās important to fight for change now, and why itās important to buy ourselves that time to fight for it.
The executions of the French Revolution were enabled by the capture of the state apparatus. Control of the state is absolutely a useful tool, and rejecting democracy as a means of acquiring control, or denying enemies control, is nothing short of foolishness. And certainly the French Revolution didnāt occur all in a moment. Revolution is only as powerful as the opinions backing it - right now, what do you see in the American people as regarding opinions towards your ideology? You really think youāve got a shot right now?
Make the vote. Itās a day of your fucking life, at most. It buys you extra years to build what you need to build; to educate who you need to educate.
Donāt let fascism win because of apathy towards who controls the state. Who controls the state is important, even if you donāt like that it is.
So by that logic, society has been getting more fascist effectively every day since the 17th century, correct?
My society isnāt doing genocide when it wasnāt before. It remains backing a genocidal ethnostate. It was backing a genocidal ethnostate before. It was backing a genocidal ethnostate since before I was born. Funny enough, my society was doing genocide itself, and not that long ago - but thatās no longer occurring. Are we less fascist?
ā¦ how can that be a criteria for fascism? Thatās recursive.
Increased slightly in the US - GINI increased from 36ish to 40ish.
Yes, absolutely. That peopleās lives are not improving enough is a different issue.
Youāre operating from the axiom that society is getting more fascist continually, despite the logical absurdity of that considering both US and world history, and the mechanisms youāve proposed, and are desperately searching for evidence to back that up, instead of the reverse. Evidence should shape your opinion; your opinions should not shape the evidence you accept.
That there was no plausible path away, contrary to your claim?
You keep asserting there is a path away without the groundwork being lain.
What rights did they get against the wishes of the state, again?
ā¦ you do remember where most gay rights progress happened in this country, right?
Oh, I wasnāt aware direct action was what elected numerous liberal state legislatures and appointed liberal justices to the Supreme Court, silly me. I thought they were elected or something. Silly me. I guess we are living in an anarchist commune, contrary to my initial beliefs.
So fascism is when the dictator is untouchable. Thatās the only criteria for fascism. Great. Guess Pinochet wasnāt a fascist either.
This is the same stupid spiritual approach to politics that MLs spout. Sorry for being too much of a sinner for the anarchists to let into heaven.
ā¦ because I advocate for voting for the knifeā¦ I have no plan to stop it.
Okay. Thanks for being a mind-reader, but apparently not a text-reader where I advocating for the creation and strengthening of alternate bases of power to the state.
Because the metaphor falls apart when you start asking questions of motivation, because the state is not some single satanic entity for your paragnosticism to oppose. The state consists of numerous and opposing forces, many of which can be played against each other, and most of whom do not share goals. Itās the same delusion as treating ācapitalā as one thinking, malicious class entity instead of a disparate group of interests - something even fucking Stalin recognized the absurdity of.
Check please!
Sorry but I donāt have time for this sort of deluded discussion.