Ex-president also says ‘worst gang members’ are entering US, and hinted at ‘transgender operations all over the place’
Donald Trump accused Kamala Harris of running a campaign of hate at his Mar-a-Lago club in a display of projection days after his rally in New York became embroiled by racist and crude comments that aides worried might have broken through to voters in the final days of the presidential race.
The event was open to reporters but Trump took no questions – he would have almost certainly been asked about the caustic rally rhetoric – and in an attempt to change the narrative, argued Kamala Harris was stoking division.
It was also an attempt to pre-empt what could be a damaging day for the Trump campaign. Later on Tuesday, Harris will speak at a rally on the Ellipse in Washington – the same site as Trump’s rally just before the January 6 Capitol attack – to tie him directly to the riot.
It’s important to recognize that Trump does not understand hate and love like you or me. His rallies are “full of love” because he views love as loyalty to and adoration of him. Opposition for any reason is hate. He does not see racism as hate because he sees it as truth, and speaking the truth is at worst harsh but necessary.
He honestly is an old version of one of those people who won’t shut up about their haters.
Man. Take a look at that makeup line. What a weirdo.
I seriously fucking loath this guy especially when he pulls this projection bullshit…
This fucking scumbag could walk on stage, shit his pants in front of everyone, stinking so bad the people closest to him vomit, and with a straight face say “Kambala pants shitter can’t even control her own body how can we let this communist control the country!?”
I can’t wait until I can go piss on his grave.
Trump’s got so much projection he oughta open a movie theater chain
It’d go bankrupt.
fukkin IMAX
It was a fascist rally.
Oh, you mean he tried to preempt further criticism by accusing his opponent of what he is doing? Who could have predicted such a novel line of attack.
i’ll confess: i can’t think of anything i’ve ever hated as much as i hate trump
but no one, including harris, had anything to do with it. he 100% makes himself hated
Gaslight
Obstruct
Projecthate only sees hate through the lens of hate so every disagreement is born of it
“No, you.”
He lets us witness the unironic version, in its native habitat
The tasteless joke was referring to the current state of Puerto Rico right now, which IS full of trash on beaches and shit to super concerning levels. Trump supporting Puerto Ricans found it tasteless but not offensive, while Harris supporting Puerto Ricans found it offensive, this situation is fucking stupid.
Maybe if his spawn’s failson husband didn’t oppsidaisy the federal contract to restore its infrastructure to a middleman shell company nobody’s ever heard of it would be in better condition… or if it wasn’t Washington’s proving ground for the effects of cruel and unusual policies nobody except companies want. Or if they could spend money on their own infrastructure before paying back bonds like everyone else can legally do. Or maybe if Trump gave any shits at all about it as his entire presidency was riddled with hatred towards US territories like “at least the only thing in range of North Korea’s nuke is Guam.” I’m sure there isn’t metric tons of evidence that his policies reflected that opinion.
If you think that’s what the joke was about, then congrats, you’re probably a conservative, because clearly you have no understanding of comedy.
Removed by mod
NPR - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for NPR:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Guardian:
Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Twitter - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Twitter:
Wiki: unreliable - Twitter (rebranded to X since July 2023) is a social network. As a self-published source, it is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the author is a subject-matter expert or the tweet is used for an uncontroversial self-description. In most cases, Twitter accounts should only be cited if the user’s identity is confirmed in some way. Tweets that are not covered by reliable sources are likely to constitute undue weight. Twitter should never be used for third-party claims related to living persons.