India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent::undefined

  • rambaroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Overrated movie. I’ll take real science and progress any day over imaginary nonsense that’ll never happen.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      A world with only “real” science and progress but without any entertainment would be quite boring.

      • ours@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        And fiction has been key to inspiring the next generation of scientists/engineers. So many NASA people have claimed to be inspired by Star Trek just to pick one.

        • gentooer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey, but I managed to write software to calibrate µCT-scanners! That is clearly way more inspiring than all this fictional stuff. Right! Right. Right?

          • meyotch@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You bet your bippy that’s inspiring! An un-calibrated scanner just doesn’t hit the same way.

            Based on the way specialized code is used, your calibration software will still be in use when they open the first scanning facility on the Moon.

            Hope you accounted for the Y10K problem!

            • gentooer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thing is that AI can help. My SO worked in a firm that does skill extraction from CVs and job ads. They do really cool stuff to match job ads with CVs using EU skill tags! It’s a really good tool to do specific things, so I really hate all the latest articles about LLMs.

              • meyotch@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I do find myself ignoring this kind of article, too, usually. I really enjoy discovering a totally new domain where the technology is implemented in a totally new way, going well beyond language applications even.

                I dream of a ‘language’ model that specializes in general machine to machine communication. It almost surely exists already, but in my line of work, machine interfacing is an endless nightmare. A ‘protocol droid’ would be such a help.

        • scmstr@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          TOS ran 1966-june3rd1969, Russia first landed unmanned in 1959, and the human race through NASA and the Apollo program first landed on the moon on june 20th 1969

          Isaac Asimov was a biochemist born in 1920, started writing published sci-fi in 1939 and full on scifi novels in 1950 (seriously, this stuff was wayyyyy ahead of its time). Died in 1992.

          Gene Roddenberry was born in 1921, died in 1991.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The black hole simulation for interstellar resulted in 3 highly regarded scientific papers.

    • kenbw2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really liked the first two thirds of that film before they went into the black hole