• kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    it’s an eternal battle. every once in a while we pass legislation to try and reign in corporate power. like for example the anti trust act in the early 1900s

    the issue is that public attention is temporary. eventually we move on to the next crisis and people forget. grow complacent.

    corporate interest, however, is eternal. it’s persistent and never gives up. it keeps pushing, infallibly, in order to weaken the structures meant to reign in their power. whether by legislation/policy (AT&T and friends unilaterally killing Net Neutrality some years back, Disney signing into law expansion of copyright, etc) or through more subtle methods (buying politicians and getting people into positions of power that have no intention of enforcing the laws)

    this is inevitably what happens with every democracy. eventually the vigilance fails and the structures of power are hijacked by opportunists.

    although having said all that, I don’t think greed had much to do with the inflation we saw. Sure, some companies took advantage and raised prices more than they needed to just to inflate that extra juicy profit margin.

    but realistically we’re headed to war and war means massive government spending which means inflation

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re separating government from the capitalists and I don’t think that’s an accurate way of looking at the world. Capital will eat itself even more voraciously than it does right now without some mediating force on itself. Government isn’t a hedge against capitalism that mediates its excesses. It is a PART of capitalism that mediates its excesses. The anti-trust act wasn’t for us; it was for them.

      But the reality that capitalism is a fundamentally unstable system can’t be fixed by blunting it. And as the rate of profit goes down, the very restraints that capital put on itself to ensure its survival must be destroyed in pursuit of that profit.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        i think most legislation is explicitly for the capitalist class. that much we probably agree with

        but i do think every once in a while, when there is a ton of pressure and the elites are scared, they throw a bone to the working class.

        it happened with the antitrust act, it happened with the New Deal, and it happened in the 1960s with the Civil Rights era and the end to Vietnam

        yes, capitalism will eat itself. it’s what we’re essentially seeing right now in slow motion. but there is something there in democracy beyond just capitalism. even if it’s buried deep down and impotent

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          it happened with the antitrust act, it happened with the New Deal, and it happened in the 1960s with the Civil Rights era and the end to Vietnam

          The thing that ties all of these exceptions together is the immediate threat of ideologically organized revolutionary cadres mobilizing the masses into a socialist revolution

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            yeah exactly. when the system is about to blow up, they turn a valve and release a little steam

            that’s one of two paths we are headed towards today. the pressure is building up. we either need to turn the valve soon OR we’re gonna blow up

            i have a feeling though we’re headed for the explosion route