soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 hours ago10x cheaper than in 2010, and 40x-100x cheaper than in the 90s. It'll probably continue to decrease.i.postimg.ccimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down112
arrow-up122arrow-down1image10x cheaper than in 2010, and 40x-100x cheaper than in the 90s. It'll probably continue to decrease.i.postimg.ccsoumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 hours agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareminzastrolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·15 hours agoI love such curve-fitting techniques. By 2025 we can launch 1t into space for a few cents, if we follow the purple line.
minus-squareFermion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoIt’s also absurd that the fit line dives down to be cheaper and earlier than an optimistic projection that will likely move further to the top right as time progresses. That’s a chart with an agenda, not an analytical regression.
minus-squaresoumerd_retardataire@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-214 hours agoYeah, and the curve would be even worse if the y-axis was linear b.t.w. 🤷
minus-squareFermion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoI think this actually is a linear regression plotted on a log y graph. Which a linear regression is a bad choice for something that must be asymptotic at best.
I love such curve-fitting techniques. By 2025 we can launch 1t into space for a few cents, if we follow the purple line.
It’s also absurd that the fit line dives down to be cheaper and earlier than an optimistic projection that will likely move further to the top right as time progresses. That’s a chart with an agenda, not an analytical regression.
Yeah, and the curve would be even worse if the y-axis was linear b.t.w. 🤷
I think this actually is a linear regression plotted on a log y graph.
Which a linear regression is a bad choice for something that must be asymptotic at best.