• rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The obvious implication of setting your own convenience above someone else’s health and safety is that you think you’re above them.

    Setting their own convenience above everyone else’s health and safety is what these Amazon drivers have done.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      An infantile ‘no u’ that’s to be expected from a stupid, spoiled child. I’m trying to do a physical fucking job with as little damage to my body as possible. But no matter how many times you hear the consequences you put on the health and safety of other people, your fucking spoiled entitlement and positioning your humanity over others causes you to interpret it as “convenience.” This is projection. You can’t be fucking bothered to wait a few seconds. That’s literally a complaint about convenience. But you’re human and I’m not so the scales must be tipped in your favor, hence your mental gymnastics.

      I wonder if you can understand that I’m replying to your comment without quoting the entire thing word for word. Dope.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        You can’t be fucking bothered to wait a few seconds. That’s literally a complaint about convenience.

        Blocking a cyclepath impacts the safety of cyclists. And yet:

        no matter how many times you hear the consequences you put on the health and safety of other people, your fucking spoiled entitlement and positioning your humanity over others causes you to interpret it as “convenience.”

        You’re projecting.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they’re too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

          Why would you quote a point and then not just fail to refute it, but reply with something that point refutes? Are you stupid?

          You’re projecting.

          Belligerent stupid child. You’ve had it spelled out for you but you can’t hear anything that doesn’t flatter your selfishness. You’re whining about an inconvenience of a few seconds and you feel entitled to my physical well being. The risk you claim only exists if you’re a fucking moron that swerves into traffic instead of a) looking, or b) waiting. The risk to my body is not a risk; it’s a consequence of the extra stress on my body that costs you nothing and is therefore of no consequence.

          The good news, you piece of shit sociopath? You don’t get a fucking say. I’m going to take care to keep myself safe and healthy no matter how much of a spoiled tantrum you throw about it.

          Seethe, you fucking lowlife.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they’re too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

            Not blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of Amazon drivers if they’re too stupid and impatient to walk a few seconds.

            you piece of shit sociopath

            U seem angry bro.