• pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s even stranger than that.

      There are a fair few trees here. But most of them aren’t natural, they were planted. Planted in perfectly straight, compass-axis lines that run for about a kilometer each, slicing the plain into a giant square checker pattern.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        in my mind that’s still forest, it’s not like most of europe’s forests are in any way natural at this point, any time you see a forest here in sweden that has a suspicious amount of oaks of the same age that’s probably a forest intended to provide lumber for ships a couple hundred years ago.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I could be wrong, but it sounds like the trees form lines on a grid with no trees in the middle. Kinda like if you went insane and put trees every 10 lines in cities skylines. I wouldn’t consider that a park, much less a forest.

          • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think if you were looking at it from the side it would look like a weird sparse forest. 3 or 4 layers might give eenough illusion if you have some brush or other greenery mixed in.

          • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Where I grew up in nd tree lines were more for wind breaks than described here.

            Here’s a bit a little south of Mandan, https://maps.app.goo.gl/fkns9wFp8NsnCvFy9

            Trees don’t really do well around here. And bear in mind this is the more woodsy part of nd. Past this it’s mostly grasslands even more.

    • odium
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      picture a 60 mph / 100 kmph road with one lane on each side winding between endless hills covered with medium height yellow grass and dotted with the occasional grazing cow, elk, etc.

      That’s what most of the state looks like in my experience. Pretty beautiful.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        sure it’s beautiful, the ocean is beautiful too, but that much open space would make me so uncomfortable. Denmark is bad enough.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The ground isn’t even the unnerving part; it’s how much of your vision is taken up by empty sky. It makes you feel absolutely miniscule

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      My family drove through Kansas once when I was a kid, and yep, the Great Plains are kinda rough on the head if you aren’t used to open grasslands. It’s like being on the ocean but grassland instead of water. Just grass and land as far as the eye can see

    • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I grew up there, it’s a tundra/prairie biome. I grew up in the he’ll creek formation area though so lots of buttes. Any trees were largely planted by settlers.

      It’s quite beautiful in its own right. Just avoid the eastern part of the state, that bits flat as a board and about as boring.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      In the fall the Farmers harvest their corn and soybeans. We live in a very flat are. In the winter you can see the frozen dirt all the way to the horizon.