Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this - gonna try posting last weekā€™s thread a different way this time)

  • hrrrngh@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    Ā·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    edit: context https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/chatgpt-david-mayer-name-glitch-ai-b2657197.html

    Time for another round of Rothschild nutsoā€™s to come around now that ChatGPT canā€™t say one of their names.

    At first I was thinking, you know, if this was because of the GDPRā€™s right to be forgotten laws or something that might be a nice precedent. I would love to see a bunch of people hit AI companies with GDPR complaints and have them actually do something instead of denying their consent-violator-at-scale machine has any PII in it.

    But honestly itā€™s probably just because he has money

    I think Sam Altmanā€™s sister accused him of doing this to her name awhile ago too (semi-recent example). I donā€™t think she was on a ā€œdonā€™t generate these words everā€ blacklist, but it seemed like she was erased from the training data and would only come up after a web search.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      Ā·
      15 days ago

      Being erased from the training data is frankly even more galling than the kind of brute force GDPR compliance they seem to have been using. It puts the lie to any claim that theyā€™re just ā€œmoving fast and breaking thingsā€ without mind to the consequences, because clearly there was some reason to prune the training data and make sure that the model didnā€™t have certain information when it was to the companyā€™s (or the founderā€™s) liking.