• toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Synapse boasts about 50,000 concurrent users on a node. Ejabberd has been tuned to 2,000,000 concurrent users which shows how efficient & scalable the setup can be. €5/mo is a lot for many folks.

    • eleitl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Poor people (who still can afford the end devices and an Internet plan) can of course share the costs in a community, or use one of the many free servers, as long as they are aware of the tradeoffs. Beigers not being choosers, and all that.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can also choose to use technologies that aren’t such resource hogs. The eventual consistency model of Matrix alone & storage costs causud many medium-sized operations to shut their doors. Distroot.org for instance had to move to XMPP to deal with costs—& I have personally seen others.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            My uploads folder is mounted with noexec. It’s easy to set your storage usage & upload quotas in Prosody or Ejabberd.

              • toastal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yes, the eventual consistency model works more like a blockchain. Sliding windows are only hiding this fundamental flaw of data usage. It has an advantage against censorship, but it isn’t worth it & chat is better treated as ephemeral than permanent (look at how much info is lost behind proprietary Discord communities).

        • eleitl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Does XMPP have feature parity with Matrix? I presume that bridges exist?