I’ve known a few in the U.S., and even worked at one. Maybe people won’t become billionaires doing this, but why wait for a complete overhaul of society to implement more of what are good ideas.

I’d also like to see more childcare co-ops, or community shared pre-k schools. Wheres the movement to build communities and pool resources around these business models in the US? In short, co-ops are the closest socialist/communist business model that’s actually implemented in the U.S., so why are more leftists not doing this?

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    For the same reasons you haven’t done so yourself. Also if you’re the owner you can still share profits or vote or whatever else you want.

    • nifty@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why should an owner share profits equally if they’re responsible for most of the startup push?

      • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Looks like you’re answering your own question now. I wouldn’t but you can if you want.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Because the initial startup push is a time-limited effort. Once the company is more established and the risk is lower, why should a founder get to continue reaping outsize rewards off the backs of others’ labor… indefinitely? Surely there comes a point when their initial risk and effort becomes fully repaid and the founder has been made whole.