Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    8 days ago

    these are some silly numbers. if all this is irreversible computation and if landauer principle holds and thereā€™s no excessive trickery or creative accounting involved, then theyā€™d need to dissipate something in range of 4.7E23 J at 1mK, or 112 Tt of TNT equivalent (112 million Mt)

    (disclaimer - not a physicist)

    • aio@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      8 days ago

      How do you figure? Itā€™s absolutely possible in principle that a quantum computer can efficiently perform computations which would be extremely expensive to perform on a classical computer.

    • FredFig@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      7 days ago

      The computation seems to be generating a uniformly random set and picking a sample of it. I can buy that itā€™d be insanely expensive to do this on a classical computer, since thereā€™s no reasonable way to generate a truly random set. Feels kinda like an unfair benchmark as this wouldnā€™t be something youā€™d actually point a classical computer at, but then again, thatā€™s how benchmarks work.

      Iā€™m not big in quantum, so I canā€™t say if thatā€™s something a quantum computer can do, but I can accept the math, if not the marketing.