• Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least they tried asbestos they can at the time.

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Wizard of Oz was one of the absolute most dangerous films ever made. OP is there a good essay about the history of this? It’s a REALLY fascinating story and a lot of people who watch and enjoy movies would probably be absorbed into reading it.

  • blackstampede@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think I looked this up at one point, and weirdly, none of them died from the asbestos. I seem to remember several of the actors died relatively young, so maybe something else got them first.

    • It was in 1939. Asbestos usually fucks you 20 years later, so around 1950. While Asbestos related diseases were acknowledged in the 40s, the widespread understanding of a health hazard was only coming up in the 60s to 80s.

      So it is very well possible, that it simply wasn’t checked.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Asbestos isn’t that bad for you when compared to heavy amphetamine and barbiturate use. But I’m sure it did help with the emotional pain of being constantly molested and likely raped or being poisoned to death from toxic paint on your face.

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just posting this all over the place? I’ve seen it on three different meme subs

  • 30p87@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw a very long summary of all that went wrong at the making of this film on Reddit once.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just goes to show you Hollywood was always a messed up place. It was indifferent to people back then, it is indifferent to people now.

    On a slightly related topic, “Babylon” was too much the same self loathing and despair from Hollywood; it ultimately bombed, despite being a technically great movie, because everyone is sick and tired of seeing Hollywood bemoaning that this messed up world is never going to change.

    I hope they will be proven wrong after the strike.

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ngl I’m pretty terminally online and spend an unhealthy amount of time reading about politics (both fringe and otherwise) but I have almost no clue what your comment is saying lol

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you can blame it on horseshoe theory, or right wingers posing as lefties in order to disincentivize the get out the vote campaigns, or simple trolling by otherwise disinterested people, but there’s a phenomenon that seems to be getting more prevalent - on lemmy in particular but also our there in social space.

        It’s folks who will unironically brand Bernie Sanders as a capitalist reactionary while praising Putin as an anti-capitalist hero standing up against imperialism. The dialog is actually remarkably close to what we saw in the early days of the_donald, where the over the top jokes about the trump train and the line transformed via some kind of sea change into what was considered serious dialog.

        There was an actual fracturing off of some elements of the relatively far left (think pacifica radio not the weathermen) with the trump-russia thing and that might have its own causality to explore, but I don’t think that does anything but provide a nucleus for the rest to organize around.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          folks who will unironically brand Bernie Sanders as a capitalist reactionary while praising Putin as an anti-capitalist hero

          who did that? where? i can’t find it.

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can claim to be as terminally online as you want but never in the heat death of the universe will you see even 1/100th of the internet

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh my god lol, am I so terminally online I’ve lost the ability to communicate? Ffffff

        Do you wanna be terminally online about politics together? 🤣

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            So OP is posting about Matt Taibbi, who is a writer who shills for this Centrism or “both parties bad” viewpoint. These talking points are often very subtle right-wing strategies. Matt is there to launder the right wing talking points of others and make them seem acceptable to US Liberals.

            The OP’s username being “Jimmy Dore is a Leftist” is yet another politically helpful lie. Jimmy Dore had this same centrist strategy, but now it’s impossible for anyone to deny he’s not just a reavtionary.

            And OP is also simping for Cornel West, another reactionary who is at the center of the “No Labels” party. This party is yet another piece of the centrist myth. And yet it’s funded by evil billionaires like Harlan Crow, who gives money to Clarence Thomas.

            These centrists not only hide their power level that is lie about their true political prescriptions, they are often there solely to fight the Democrats rather than the Republicans - an intentional spoiler third party. In the first past the post system, we are vulnerable to people voting this way rather than using gsme theory to deduce the only proper vote is for one of those two candidates.

            And this is all there to put a smudge on the reputation of Democrats. Because Republicans are never purists - they want to win, not be right.

            And Democrats do have problems worth discussing, but the game theory of the Presidential vote is this: any vote against Biden is a vote for Trump.

            So voting for Biden is Harm Reduction. His wins can delay fascism from taking over the US in 2025.

            • QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyzM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              This really shines light on that user’s motives. I banned that user because of being a really sus bot, but this meme will not be removed as no rules have been broken. Where I can learn more about the subject?

            • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fascinating and the most compelling argument that I have heard to date for the unsavoury practice of strategic voting.

            • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              And Democrats do have problems worth discussing, but the game theory of the Presidential vote is this: any vote against Biden is a vote for Trump.

              So voting for Biden is Harm Reduction. His wins can delay fascism from taking over the US in 2025

              Gotta say I hate that. I get these shills are playing the long game, but in the end, this is the same bullshit that got us in this predicament in the first place - vote for one because the other is worse!! We will never progress with that hanging over our heads.

              • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, I despise the two-party system. Protest voting won’t magically give us the democracy we deserve. It has to be done on a small scale, local and state level. It’s gotta be organized. Governors are particularly invulnerable to this two-party bullshit, and that is I believe why a few states have Ranked Choice Voting now.

                And actually voters aren’t to blame. The founding fathers understood what they were doing to our democracy, and them saying a two party system must not be established was probably more of a dogwhistle that it should be done immediately because it will work.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  some of the founders were outspoken in their support of a two-party system. you don’t seem to know as much as you pretend.

                  edit: or you’re lying.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                We will never progress with that hanging over our heads.

                Which is horrifying recklessness on the part of Democrats. “Be happy with ‘not fascist’ because that’s the best we’re willing to do” only has to fail once.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And Democrats do have problems worth discussing, but the game theory of the Presidential vote is this: any vote against Biden is a vote for Trump.

              wrong. only a vote for trump is a vote for trump. a vote for anyone else is a vote against trump.

              • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Third parties in our system are spoilers. Even more so when the “No Labels” party is funded by evil billionaires with the explicit goal of being a spoiler third party.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Third parties in our system are spoilers.

                  so did the greens spoil the 2020 election? the 2008? 1992?

                  spoilers are a lie.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Jimmy Dore had this same centrist strategy, but now it’s impossible for anyone to deny he’s not just a reavtionary.

              i deny it. i think he’s a dummy, maybe politically illiterate, but he’s not a reactionary.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Matt Taibbi, who is a writer who shills for this Centrism

              no he doesn’t

              or “both parties bad” viewpoint.

              that’s a different perspective entirely.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Matt is there to launder the right wing talking points of others and make them seem acceptable to US Liberals.

              i dont think matt is talking to liberals at all: he’s talking to leftists.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cornel West, another reactionary who is at the center of the “No Labels” party.

              this is just a lie.

              cornel west is a leftist and he’s running for the green party nomination.

              • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh, you’re right. No Labels hasn’t chosen a candidate and Cornel West is indeed vying for the green party ticket.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              These centrists not only hide their power level

              the fact you would use this ACTUALLY FASCIST terminology makes me suspect you are either trying to paint them as fascists or are one yourself.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              they are often there solely to fight the Democrats rather than the Republicans - an intentional spoiler third party. In the first past the post system, we are vulnerable to people voting this way rather than using gsme theory to deduce the only proper vote is for one of those two candidates.

              cornel west has said he’s running to defeat trump, and attacked him in the sean hannity interview. whatever your bias is, it doesn’t align with the facts.

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So voting for Biden is Harm Reduction. His wins can delay fascism from taking over the US in 2025.

              you don’t know what harm reduction OR fascism is.

                • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  harm reduction is accepting that a fascist is going to win whether they are democrat or republican and doing what you can to mitigate the harm that will be done by the current system.

                  fascism is a strictly stratified society with every institution serving the interest of the state. democrats and republicans are both fascist parties.

    • zaphod@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP is trying to do this in order to bring popularity to a bunch of reactionary political takes.

      How? By posting a meme about asbestos? Do the reactionaries think asbestos is safe to use as snow special effect or what?