• exohuman
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, we definitely do. We are already seeing the result of not thinking ahead in the southwest. I’m not really joking about the plants. We need nuclear plants to provide the clean energy to desalinate on the levels we need to sustain agriculture and cities without contributing to global warming.

    • Edmond Dantesk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      … or maybe switch to a less water intensive form of agriculture ?

      Edit : I mean, how sustaining a wasteful practice with a huge wasteful infrastructure is progress ?

        • Edmond Dantesk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe we should, but I’m not sure we can - because one (nuclear + desalination) acts as a disincentive to the other (actually chaning practice).

          Also, building a nuclear reactor takes a lot of time (do we have it ?), changing agricultural practices can start right now and scale progressively.