• GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Luigi’s alleged actions were an attempt at drawing attention to social issues. Xi Jinping’s actions on the other hand are attempts at violently suppressing opposition ergo authoritarianism.

        • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s a fun way of saying the government consumes you if you commit wrongthink. That’s authoritarian lol.

          • _lunar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            so according to your own definition, luigi killed that CEO for committing wrongthink and is authoritarian.

            like davel just showed you, they’re doing the exact same thing, but it’s only bad to you when it’s law and not adventurism. anarchists or whatever you want to call yourself really are just vibes-based and it’s so fucking annoying and reductive. you will never accomplish anything because you instinctively oppose progress as “authoritarian” when it’s actually made. you just want to feel like a rebel no matter what kind of system you’re living in.

          • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            If only Adolf Eichmann had committed his atrocities 10 years later or so, all he had to do was say “the authoritarians are canceling me for wrongthink, literally 1984” and you liberals would have ate it the fuck up

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Can you provide any support for your argument that the PRC executes billionaires because of opposition, and not, say, massive corruption? Because you again seem to be making up a narrative to suit your present biases without looking at any sources.