The way I figure it, one of a few possibilities is true:
1 there is a god. He lets all the bad shit happen, and therefore isn’t worthy of dedication.
B: there is no god. Shit happens. Nobody is there to be worthy of dedication.
III- there is a god. It kicked off the big bang and sat back to watch. Either it has the ability to affect positive change and doesn’t, or it can’t. In which case, it’s still not worthy of dedication.
The end result is the same for me
A few more:
Delta, there is a god and he’s good because nothing in this reality really matters, it’s just a test (for us) or experiment (that we are a part of).
Five) after being more hands on in the old times, and trying many different things, god decided to try again elsewhere and just lets shit play out as it will here.
六> We are god experiencing a reality as lesser beings because it gets boring being all powerful and knowing. Any godly effects are done for entertainment purposes rather than making things better or worse.
The fact that you used 3 different list symbols got me lmao
This is called deism, by the way. The idea that God made the world and now just let’s it run.
God
Or an administrator/programmer.
God is a Dwarf Fortress player.
Which god would that be?
I’d wager the same one who put all their energy into the the big bang then has just had the worst hangover ever since
I’d be willing to accept this theology