• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know what I wrote, and I wrote a list of counterpoints that work as reasons that I have to use Brave. I thought it was clear that one of the things that are important about is that it can give a way to pay to users and that no one else (that I know of) does it.

    "“All in all” was meant as way to summarize what I wrote above, not overrule it. I can’t force you to interpret it in the way that I meant it, but in case you are in doubt: Safari or anything else from/for Apple is automatically disqualified.

    • snoweA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought it was clear that one of the things that are important about is that it can give a way to pay to users and that no one else (that I know of) does it.

      Ok, it is now. Thank you for making it clear to me. I misunderstood

      Safari or anything else from/for Apple is automatically disqualified.

      Ok, thank you for making that clear. May I ask why you’re against Apple, but not Google? I consider Google a much higher risk at this point in time.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m very much against Google when their actions are taken to enforce their monopoly and that give no other choice to people. For all the flak that Chromium gets, it is still open source and the browsers that are built on it do not necessarily need to implement all the things exactly like Chrome. Brave has not adopted manifest v3 and already stated that will not implement WEI.