• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a common misconception that governments need to collect tax money so that they can finance public works.

    In reality, any government that issues its own currency can technically spend as much as it wants to, whether it has the tax base to balance it out or not.

    The only reasons to tax are to limit inflation, balance the wealth distribution, and maintain an incentive for people to actually care about your currency.

    • States that governments don’t need taxes to finance stuff

      Lists reasons why governments really do need to do so and that not doing so is a terrible idea

      Refuses to elaborate

      Leaves

      What did he mean by this?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Printing your own money is equivalent to a flat tax, which is bad for the poors.

      But you’re spot on, taxes are meant for wealth redistribution.

    • Juice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Wealth is pinned to production and currency is pinned to wealth. You fundamentally misunderstand what wealth, money, and power are and how they function in society. Alienation from society and idealism distort the nature of these subjects. You’re right to question the way these things function, but you’ll not get much further than MMT or other idealist cul du sacs. If you want to understand how wealth operates as a basis for society, they you’ll need to start to study Marx