🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoMake illegally trained LLMs public domain as punishmentwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square178linkfedilinkarrow-up11.66Karrow-down141file-text
arrow-up11.61Karrow-down1external-linkMake illegally trained LLMs public domain as punishmentwww.theregister.com🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square178linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoJust because something is defined legally instead of technologically, that doesn’t make it vague. The modification violates copyright when the result is a derivative work; no more, no less.
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoWhat is a derivative work though? That’s again extremely vague and has been subject to countless lawsuits seeking to determine the bounds.
Just because something is defined legally instead of technologically, that doesn’t make it vague. The modification violates copyright when the result is a derivative work; no more, no less.
What is a derivative work though? That’s again extremely vague and has been subject to countless lawsuits seeking to determine the bounds.