ryujin470@fedia.io to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 days agoWhat design language/guideline is better: Google's Material Design, or Microsoft's Fluent Design?message-squaremessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up153arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up145arrow-down1message-squareWhat design language/guideline is better: Google's Material Design, or Microsoft's Fluent Design?ryujin470@fedia.io to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoIt’s a personal thing, I guess, but Microsoft UI designs (to me) look all god awful crap permanently stuck in 90’s computer UIs. Every time I see teams or -gagh- outlook, I have to vomit a little in my mouth, its just off putting. I don’t like google either but at least their UI mostly feels nice Then there is apple, but usually the “keep it simple” is way, WAY pushed too far.
It’s a personal thing, I guess, but Microsoft UI designs (to me) look all god awful crap permanently stuck in 90’s computer UIs.
Every time I see teams or -gagh- outlook, I have to vomit a little in my mouth, its just off putting.
I don’t like google either but at least their UI mostly feels nice
Then there is apple, but usually the “keep it simple” is way, WAY pushed too far.