Summary

Two studies reveal that Walmart’s entry into communities lowers household incomes by 6% over 10 years and increases poverty by 8%, even when accounting for cost savings.

Its practices, such as undercutting competitors, suppressing wages, and squeezing suppliers, harm local economies by reducing employment and forcing smaller businesses to close.

Walmart’s “monopsony power” enables it to pay lower wages and dominate suppliers, compounding these effects.

The findings challenge the idea that low prices alone benefit communities, emphasizing long-term economic harm.

——

Non-paywall link

  • Pavel Chichikov@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    19 hours ago

    For the morons out there: No, this does not mean high prices are good. It just means low prices can sometimes be bad if certain principles aren’t in play. You’re welcome.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago
      • lower prices until other small businesses close down
      • increase the price back
      • everyone needs to buy from you because you are the only supplier
      • profit
      • It’s even more insidious:

        • Lower prices to drive out all competition
        • Become largest local employer
        • Keep wages low, people don’t have many other jobs to choose
        • Everyone has to buy from you, and those working for you are stuck in their low-wage jobs
        • Excessive profits