I’ve been waiting until after Christmas day to make this post, but some of our communities recently have had a lot of noise and upset over someone that uses neopronouns that most people are unfamiliar with.

So I want to make this clear. A persons pronouns are to be respected. This is true when the user is using neopronouns that you’re unfamiliar with. It’s true even if you think someone is trolling. Pronouns are not rewards for good behaviour. They aren’t only to be respected when you like the person you’re interacting with, or if their pronouns “make sense” to you. Trolls, spammers, twitter users, it doesn’t matter who they are, your options are to respect their pronouns, or to not engage with them.

I really want to re-iterate the importance of this. Gender diverse folk are undermined, invalidated and questioned at every step of our lives. As a community, we need to be working to undo that, not creating more of it, and that means there is no space for treating pronouns (including neopronouns) as a reward for good behaviour.

This isn’t a free reign for trolls and spammers. The rules still apply. Trolling, spamming, etc will continue to be dealt with, but it’s not an excuse to act as if respecting someones pronouns is optional.

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you think respecting neopronouns is a horrible idea, you picked the wrong instance

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        is this a real comparison? are you doing a “slippery slope” thing?

        how EXACTLY is calling drag by their preferred term going to pave the way for pedophiles to take over lgbtq spaces?

        • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There’s no slope, I don’t think people who are attracted to minors should be accepted or validated, and making that an instance rule makes me deeply uncomfortable.

          I’m just sick of seeing Minor Attracted People being blindly accepted into our spaces.

          We have to draw the line somewhere.

          Edit: I literally don’t care about the dragonfucker, dragons aren’t real and aren’t children.

          • yuri@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            i don’t know how or why you wandered in here, but you’re the only person taking about whatever it is you’re talking about

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are this close to a ban for your ongoing conflation of paedophilia and neopronouns. Your question was also answered in my initial post. Pronouns are to be respected. Behaviour is actionable.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            35
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m going to make this simple. There is no ability for a minor to consent, and non consensual behaviour of any sort is not welcome on this instance.

            And nor are you for repeated conflation of the two topics.