• Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Found the person who’s never lived in a area with dial-up or conventional sattelite as their only options. I hate Elon as much as the next person, but starlink is revolutionary for those with no other options.

    • Yaky@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Second-hand experience from many years ago when Starlink first rolled out: my friend has a cabin in the Appalachians, outside any cell service, so Starlink sounds great for that. However, Starlink site says there is “no coverage” for that area. Yes, somehow, no coverage for a satellite service. The nearest area with coverage was a town with already-decent 4G. And most large US cities had coverage too. So our inside “conspiracy theory” was that Starlink resells 5G/4G modems for hipsters.

      Have no idea if the situation changed since then.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Starlink works differently than conventional sattelite. I’m not an expert, so I’m not going to try to explain it beyond saying that I think it’s due to the properties of the sattelites being low orbit, requiring more ground transmission stations and more sattelites than conventional sattelite internet.

        I believe their coverage has increased greatly over the past few years. When it was first out my parents also didn’t have coverage. They do now, and have for a couple of years.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Do you understand how slow dial up is? Do you understand that conventional sattelite throttles you to unusable speeds after a shockingly low data limit is used up? Those services are not modern internet services. Starlink is. In my testing, I got an average of 45mbps down over a 40GB download. That’s so fucking fast compared to even DSL, which is commonly 10mbps down, and even slower up.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Also, typical satellite has horrendous lag. I used to work with someone who was in a remote area (didn’t even have cell service) and the quality was fine talking with him through VoIP, but it would take a few seconds to get a response for anything. I can only imagine video. Current boss has Starlink and I wouldn’t know a difference.

          Heck, up until a few years ago my father-in-law had 1.5mbps DSL and that was pretty much unusable.