Hello everyone,

I recently came across an article on TorrentFreak about the BitTorrent protocol and found myself wondering if it has remained relevant in today’s digital landscape. Given the rapid advancements in technology, I was curious to know if BitTorrent has been surpassed by a more efficient protocol, or if it continues to hold its ground (like I2P?).

Thank you for your insights!

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Problem with IPFS, is that it’s not really that decentralized as I wish it was. Since by default the data is not shared across the network, meaning if nobody is downloading and hosting that node, you are still the only one having a copy of the data. Meaning if your connection is gone or if you get censored, there is no other node where the IPFS data is living. It only works if somebody else is activily downloading the data.

        Ow, and then you also need to Pin the content, or the data will be removed again -,-

        Furthermore, the look-up via DHT is very slow and resolving the data is way too slow in order to make sense. People expect today max 1 or 2 seconds look-up time + page load would result in 4 or 5 seconds… Max… However with IPFS this could be 20, 30 seconds or even minutes…

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        That’s just for files though. Imagine a specific decentralised protocol for hosting websites.

        You can technically host a website on IPFS but it’s a nightmare and makes updating the website basically impossible 2021 wikipedia IPFS Mirror. A specific protocol would make it far more accessible.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      There’s some cryptobro projects about sticking distributed file sharing on top of ~ THE BLOCKCHAIN ~.

      I’m skeptical, but it might actually be a valid use of such a thing.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Blockchain is a nice technology, but not all the solutions need blockchain technology. Just like BitTorrent doesn’t require blockchain, a decentralized internet alternative also doesn’t need blockchain.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      That would be very cool, I know we have onion sites that operate on the Tor network that use keypairs for the domains, but the sites themselves are still centrally hosted by a person, anonymously hosted but still centrally hosted.