• “neutral” as if.

    Edit: also oh no! Not the Stalinist… prohibition on using handcuffs?

    Chapter X, Russian Justice

    But the idea was there in the minds of those who were to define the penal policy and the Code of 1922, and set down the principle that punishment was not for the purpose of revenge and might not have for its purpose the infliction of physical pain. With this beginning there was a steady progress toward the removing of those indignities that tend to degrade a man, until the Correctional Labor Code of 1933 completed the process. In the meantime various amendments have prohibited torture, the use of handcuffs, solitary confinement, deprivation of food, or any other measure that would have the effect of degradation or do physical harm to the person.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      lol what a cherry picked example, ignoring ranks of his people getting picked up by state agents to be put to death. How disingenuous

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which ranks of his people were put to death?

        Declassified CIA report:

        Even in Stalin’s time there was collective leadership. The Western idea of a dictator within the Communist setup is exaggerated. Misunderstandings on that subject are caused by lack of comprehension of the real nature and organization of the Communist power structure. Stalin, although holding wide powers, was merely the captain of a team and it seems obvious that Khrushchev will be the new captain.

        A lot of the cold war propaganda about Stalin turned out to be bullshit, as contemporary Western academic historians will tell you.