• radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The poorer you are the less you can afford paying for it. This is really just a method of opening the streets just for the rich.

    Regressive solution.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Counterpoint, this funds public transport which is cheaper than car ownership and driving.

      If you are poor, this pushes you to take a train or bus which saves you money.

      The only people this taxes is the rich which makes this a progressive solution.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Cars in Manhattan were already “just for the rich”.
      It’s simply making the rich think for a moment, before taking their car to the street. Which makes the streets safer for everyone who’s not rich.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is really just a method of opening the streets just for the rich.

      Anyone who takes the bus knows this is bullshit