• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s right, Americans should only use US government approved domestic spyware/propaganda platforms. Get rekt lmao. 🤡

    • misterdoctor@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Biden has my wife and kids locked up in a political prison, if I don’t spread anti china propaganda via memes on my lemmy instance, he’s going to kill them

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s not that it isn’t spyware, it’s that all social media is. If the US had a problem with spyware, they would make a sweeping laws about spyware. Not just target one platform. This is racism pure and simple.

        • 𝚐𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚒𝚎@h4x0r.host
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ok, but that has nothing to do with the comment OP’s comment. I agree with what you said up until the last sentence. Racism? Lmfao. So the Biden admin are all racists too? It has nothing to do with race. No nation-state is going to let another nation-state spy on their own citizens. Race has nothing to do with it.

          • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            We already had in place Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act, and the American Data Privacy and Protection Act. These acts prevent companies from giving US consumer data to foreign adversaries. Why did we make another law specifically naming tiktok?

            Also, this is a fun watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8dctPC3c4A

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    spy on american citizens

    BTW is there any actual proof tiktok is doing what the above US companies are? And not just some vague orientalism from anglophone media sources?

    Also lets not pretend a US tiktok ban has anything to do with security or privacy. It’s about being unable to silence pro-palestine views, which they’re able to do only on the US-run platforms.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        True, but when the US projects the crimes it commits against the world onto its enemies, we need to see actual evidence.

  • airportline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The TikTok ban is something Mark Zuckerberg lobbied for. It’s not a good thing.

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yeah, just the Chinese aps do that shit. Regular Western apps always protect your data and would never misuse it in any way.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They want the Chinese to buy it from them! /s

      I don’t understand why the response isn’t just stronger privacy laws on this.

  • Fern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    People love to shit on TikTok, but honestly, I really enjoy it. It’s not for everyone, and that’s okay. Short-form content can be a lot—for me too. It took me a while to hone my algorithm and wade through stuff I didn’t like. But TikTok stands out compared to Instagram Reels or YouTube Shorts. The content feels more authentic and engaging. When I scroll through TikTok, I often feel like I’m learning something new or having my perspective challenged.

    TikTok’s algorithm doesn’t completely suppress leftist views. It’s one of the few platforms where conversations about issues like the genocide in Palestine actually gain traction. Of course, it’s a corporate platform, and it’s far from perfect. It has its alt-right pipelines and played a role in Trump winning this election because it was popular, and his team utilized it. But let’s not pretend that’s unique to TikTok—all social media platforms are allowing and often skewing towards the alt-right.

    And then there’s the whole “TikTok is Chinese spyware” narrative, which just feels like a distraction. If we’re worried about surveillance, let’s not ignore how U.S.-based platforms are also spying on us—for corporations and the government alike. Singling out TikTok for being Chinese misses the bigger picture entirely. This ban is happening because Meta and others don’t want competition.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t remember much political shit with vine. Just silly videos that didn’t reek of trying to game the algorithm to make money. It makes me think of how tablets failed originally but then apple made them and everyone wanted to pay to lick the turtleneck guy’s asshole.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago
    • Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR): TikTok Law Is an Attempt to Censor, Not a Warning to Big Tech (Emphasis original)

      [NYT’s Cecilia] Kang’s thesis [link] was premised on years’ worth of media and policymaker fearmongering that TikTok user data was susceptible to surveillance by the Chinese government (BuzzFeed News, 6/17/22; Forbes, 10/20/22; Guardian, 11/7/22). According to Kang’s colleagues, the law’s enactment was prompted by “concerns that the Chinese government could access sensitive user data” (New York Times, 4/26/24). In 2023, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte sought to prohibit TikTok throughout his state on the grounds that “the Chinese Communist Party” was “collecting US users’ personal, private and sensitive information” (Montana Free Press, 5/17/23). (Gianforte’s attempt was later thwarted by a federal judge.)

      If such fears were officials’ genuine motivation, one could hope that broader data-privacy regulation might follow. Yet, as the Times neglected to mention, the spying accusations are tenuous—and deeply cynical. As even US intelligence officials concede, apprehensions about China’s access to TikTok user data are strictly hypothetical (Intercept, 3/16/24). And, despite its bombshell headline “Analysis: There Is Now Some Public Evidence That China Viewed TikTok Data,” CNN (6/8/23) cautioned that said evidence—a sworn statement from a former ByteDance employee—“remains rather thin.”

      Given their dubious nature, it’s hard to see these data-privacy claims as anything other than a pretext for the US to throttle TikTok. By forcing either divestment or a ban, the US, at least in theory, wins: It transfers a tremendously lucrative and influential company into its own hands, or it prevents that company from serving as a platform—albeit one with plenty of problems—on which people can engage in and learn from discourses that are critical of US empire.

    • CNN, 2022: TikTok moves US users’ data to Oracle servers to address security concerns
    • US private equity firms own more of TikTok than anyone. WSJ: What Is TikTok Worth? Some Say $20 Billion, Others Say $100 Billion. The CEO is Singaporean, Shou Zi Chew, and the VP is American, Michael Beckerman.
    • [Mitt] Romney Admits Push to Ban TikTok Is Aimed at Censoring News Out of Gaza

      “Some wonder why there was such overwhelming support for us to shut down, potentially, TikTok or other entities of that nature,” said Romney. “If you look at the postings on TikTok and the number of mentions of Palestinians relative to other social media sites, it’s overwhelmingly so among TikTok broadcasts.”

    • Paris Marx: The TikTok ban is all about preserving US power The platform isn’t a national security threat, but a challenge to Silicon Valley’s dominance

    I point none of this out to defend TikTok as some beacon of hope: it’s just another corporate social media platform. I don’t have a TikTok account and don’t use it.

  • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    We’ve already banned Tiktok and 50+ other apps after a border clash.

    When will our country start our own mainstream social media networks and get to ban Fb, Insta & X(Formally known as Twitter) which are USAmerican companies that push USAmerican propaganda and spies on Indian citizens?