You are failing because you assume that when given the facts they they would agree with you. For the most part they know the facts and choose deliberately to act in the way they have.
Imagine what your decisions would look like if you chose to actively punish people you disagreed with.
You see someone running by the pool and say,” don’t run you could slip and fall.”
Solution one: post a sign and install slip resistant coating, making it harder to fall, but still possible.
Solution two: see the person running and deliberately trip them so they fall, rending your warning correct.
They have such vastly different motivations and priorities from you that you can’t understand how they could know the truth and act like they do.
You lay out the bare facts. Proof is demanded. You lay out proof: studies, papers, data. The response is that the data is made up and that these so-called scientist and experts are not to be trusted. That’s followed up that it’s all the fault of Kamela anyway because she slept her way to the top or something similar. Oh yes, great conversations.
We’ve also been trying to explain facts but that’s even less effective.
You are failing because you assume that when given the facts they they would agree with you. For the most part they know the facts and choose deliberately to act in the way they have.
Imagine what your decisions would look like if you chose to actively punish people you disagreed with.
You see someone running by the pool and say,” don’t run you could slip and fall.”
Solution one: post a sign and install slip resistant coating, making it harder to fall, but still possible.
Solution two: see the person running and deliberately trip them so they fall, rending your warning correct.
They have such vastly different motivations and priorities from you that you can’t understand how they could know the truth and act like they do.
Some people have been trying, sure. But most just choose to try and prove their superiority by being as obnoxious as possible.
And no, saying what you believe to be right in a condescending matter is not “trying to explain facts”.
You lay out the bare facts. Proof is demanded. You lay out proof: studies, papers, data. The response is that the data is made up and that these so-called scientist and experts are not to be trusted. That’s followed up that it’s all the fault of Kamela anyway because she slept her way to the top or something similar. Oh yes, great conversations.