We know now that you can’t turn “base metals” into gold through chemical processes, but if you could, gold would no longer be scarce and therefore no more valuable than the base metals.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I could not be trusted with this power. I would rather tank the gold standard than be rich.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Gold is a very useful metal, and I would like it to be as cheap as aluminum. There are so many things you could do with a metal with great conductivity and chemical resistance. Currently, high price is preventing us from building all sorts of things out of it.

      So, if you’re ever get the chance to turn worthless trash into gold, you should go for it.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Why? The world will just move to a different standard, and although it would hurt rich people it also likely would cause a ton of problems for regular folk too

      • CameronDev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Will it though? There are far to many egregiously wealthy people on our current monetary standard, we dont seem to be moving on. I will happily pay someone in leaves though.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The only way I can see gold becoming cheap being a problem for me is due to it being a problem for rich people and them making it my problem.