It’s sand

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I doubt it was the rules, so much as Ada going nuclear and just banning people as a knee-jerk reaction to anyone who disagreed with them.

    I also find it kinda of stupid to be butthurt about moving to world because of other moderators on the instance that wouldn’t necessarily moderate this or any other community made on the instance unless the community itself made them mods.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah that was definitely my impression of blahaj moderation. Shame the 196 mods dropped the ball by moving to .world of all places, and it certainly would have been good to ask the 196 users on blahaj first - they would probably have at least come up with a better instance to move to, if they agreed at all.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is Ada a person or a group or something?

      Also: .world is already one of the biggest instances and fediverse is all about decentralization. And what ever Ada did on blåhaj, someone could do an .world too, right?

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Ada is the admin of Blajah zone.

        Also: .world is already one of the biggest instances and fediverse is all about decentralization.

        Then run your own instance/community. That’s the beauty of this system.

        And what ever Ada did on blåhaj, someone could do an .world too, right?

        They can, and sometimes do. On a mod level, and only in a handful of (terrible) communities. I have yet to see any kind of bias bullshit coming from the admin level.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago
            1. They were literally just asking mods to actually do some work and not simply banning people who disagreed with them or said particular phrases or keywords that many use to indicate a bad actor, without actually seeing if they were indeed a bad actor. Like what blahaj not only does, but is proud of.

            2. They postponed the changes until they can better clarify what the intent was due to all the blowback from people who didn’t understand that.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Using an example of allowing flat earth comments was apparently the exact opposite of what they were trying to get mods to stop moderating, which doesn’t generate much confidence in them getting it right the second time.

              • LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                23 hours ago

                I think it’s kind of funny that they mention to allow the flat earth comments when just previously saying that they want to prevent cult-like behavior; flat-eathers won’t listen despite the evidence. Then again, verifiability doesn’t seem to be holding strong these days