• iowagneiss@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They might be motivated by political views, fact checking, etc, but the subreddits I’ve seen discussing it (baseball, Iowa) are focusing on the fact that you need an account to see anything now. Screenshots from X would still be permitted; just not direct links due to the degree of interaction with the site required to view the material.

    It’s sound reasoning, in my opinion. X either links you to an actual source or is a short post easily captured in a screenshot.

      • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Really, what don’t those people melt down over. They’re reactionaries, they by essence have to melt down over everything.

    • lukewarm_ozone@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not totally insane reasoning but, like, people can just downvote links to Twitter if they want to, and/or use an extension to automatically redirect to a Nitter instance. The only people actually affected by censoring Twitter community-wide is those who would want to look at the context.

          • Baguette@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I stopped using twitter way longer than that, tbh I’m basically gone from most social media

            Twitter used to be more interesting and I talked with a lot of people. Nowadays it’s pretty devoid