• in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump and his cronies are gonna try and use social media like Hitler used the radio. He want his voice in the homes of every German American.

    • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. If you control the biggest source(s) of information, then people eventually will only know what you want them to know.

  • TechAnon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    False! Everyone can unfollow. There’s just a few more steps to delete your account. I was able to do it without issue.

  • happydoors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Some people…” most people I know have been forced to follow POTUS or VP and cannot unfollow. Finally got my wife to delete her accounts

  • ulterno
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    How long before they start making posts and adding likes in your name?

  • Kadaj21@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good thing i don’t have an account on there. I do have a facebook account and checked to see if i I was set follow their pages and Im not. Might have something to so with not following any pages or even really logging in but a fee times a year when my wife pesters about checking my notifications or certain posts from family members

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Worth noting that the follow option on your account likely isn’t accurate. That’s a large part of the complaints; I didn’t follow the potus or vp accounts when looking at it on my own page, but my friend saw that I was following them via the “followed by [friend’s name] +[#] more” option. Like when you tap that, it allows you to see which of your mutual friends follow the account. And I showed up on that list. On my own account page, it didn’t show that I was following them. The button said “Follow” so I couldn’t unfollow them.

      Here is the vp page from my perspective. Notice that I’m not following it, and therefore can’t unfollow it:

      Now here’s my friend’s “your mutual friends follow this account” list, which shows me as a follower:

      I had to restrict the vp account, which then updated the “Follow” button into an “unfollow” button. But the fact that I had to restrict the account before I was allowed to unfollow it (because I was being forced to shadow-follow the account) is what people have issues with.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think he will, but solely because he happens to be Jewish. Same reason Ben Shapiro won’t. Because ultimately these are the sort of people who think the nazis are bad not because of what they believed or did, but because of who they targeted.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve been saying it about Shapiro and Prager for years. Anyone can be a fascist regardless of background, it’s important to acknowledge the groups that were targeted and to understand that they will likely be targeted again, but acting like Jewish people, queer people, roma, etc are specially pure and good or like Germans, Italians, Japanese, and Spaniards are specially capable of evil is thinking in the lines fascism wants you to.

          Fascism is wrong and evil because the ideas behind it are foolish and cruel. It turns class politics into identity politics for powerful identities (organizing as an identity isn’t bad when it’s the vulnerable, there’s a huge difference between the deaf organizing as the deaf and the hearing organizing as the hearing). It proposes simplistic and contradictory narratives that point towards destruction rather than construction, towards hate rather than love, and towards selfishness rather than empathy. It’s the worst aspects of human nature

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s long, long past any sentimentality about his “soul”. Musk is insane, but Zuckerberg is calculating. He wouldn’t show up on stage doing a salute unless he knows he stands to gain.

        • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s some thriller book around the collapse of the US power grid that had a Zuck in it, he pre-replaced all his teeth with ceramic (I think?) so he’d never need a dentist. Had a bunker built off-book twice underground with food, supplies, security.

          I assume this Zuck is that Zuck (6 months from now, with our current timeline speed.)

          That Zuck died pretty quick, hilariously. Terrible people never win in the end, and they’re always alone.

          It’s not because a fiction book on the human condition is right, it’s because when it comes right down to it, survival of the fittest kicks in, and no being in the universe would pick a piece of garbage as the winning choice.

          The mistake these oligarchs always make, is that they think the “alpha male” in a pack chose his role because he was greedy and powerful. In reality, the alpha male was chosen by the pack, because he was the best chance of the pack’s survival.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think a lot ot these tech bros bear a great irony to the concept of survival of the fittest. They were absolutely the fittest to a period of the early 21st century where a middle class kid with enough brains and work ethic in the right place with the right idea and no ethics or hesitation could become incredibly wealthy and powerful. But they created a collapse or merely drastically amplified one that was coming instead of trying to prevent it. Or maybe even they are trying, but the traits that allowed them to rise to power made them unable to actually help.

            But regardless, they cannot function in lean times. They’re the socioeconomic equivalent to hypercarnivores. It’s a great position when times are good for it, but it’s not a stable one. In lean times the fittest species are often small omnivorous scavengers who don’t use too much energy to sustain themselves

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            These people need the libertarian myth of the alpha male/ubermensch because otherwise, they’d have to face the fact the their success is really from inheritance and luck. Hard work and intelligence doesn’t take you very far when, statistically, your boss is a sociopath.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    After a decade of wondering why my friends still used Instagram, they’re finally talking about uninstalling it this week. So I’m all for these new features, keep em coming zuck!

    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Make sure to point them towards Pixelfed! The more people we can get onboarded to federated platforms, the better.

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The good ol’ Collective Action Problem.

        The thing is, you don’t have to leave in order to get out. I know it sounds oxymoronic, but let me explain.

        You’re not limited to just one social media account, that much is obvious to everybody. So, create an account on a competing platform, and be the reason someone else is able to justify quitting. If someone else says “hey, I want to leave” and you also say “I want to leave too,” but neither of you have even made an account elsewhere, nobody ever leaves.

        If you make a new account elsewhere, then when that person says “hey, I want to leave,” you can say, “follow me on Pixelfed,” and even if they don’t uninstall Instagram, and just make a Pixelfed account, you’re one less instance of

        I can’t follow the people I want to follow anywhere else

        to keep them stuck there. You’ve now had them make an account, then someone they know goes through the same process you did, and so on.

        Eventually, the alternative is populated enough that deleting the old service isn’t difficult anymore. All you have to do is be one of the people to take the first step, and become the reason for someone else to justify leaving.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          that’s true, I already have a bunch of fediverse accounts, though lemmy is the only one I frequently use

      • Lenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had the same problem, left anyway so I wasn’t supporting… that, and it turns out it’s all ok on the other side. You’ll be ok.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        3 days ago

        You wanna know why they’re there? Because you’re there. The ol’ catch-22 of social media walled gardens. Inconvenient for literally everyone except the guys running them.

        Here’s hoping people figure out that the Fediverse is specifically designed to solve that problem.

        • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Ah right, when I leave Instagram, the people who have 2 million+ followers are gonna follow me to the fediverse. Yup that’s how that works, thank you very much for being so damn helpful today.

          Inb4 “if everyone does it”. If everyone stopped driving their car, the government would be forced to make our cities more walkable. But that’s simply not gonna happen is it?

          • Breve@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ah right, when I leave Instagram, the people who have 2 million+ followers are gonna follow me to the fediverse.

            Actually yes, creators will use social networks that contain a significant enough amount of their fans. By moving, you are helping to change their mind!

            It’s the same defeatist attitude as “voting doesn’t matter because my 1 vote doesn’t change anything” except it can and does more often than you think.

            • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              no. if you want to compare it to politics, it’s like voting for a third party in the us. it’s 0.1% vs 99.9%

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You don’t need everyone to do it, but if you can get enough people to do it, it will be foolish for those 2M+ follower accounts to not also have a presence on pixelfed or wherever. Most content creators are not limited to just one platform. Streamers will stream to Twitch, edit and upload the vod to YouTube, cut highlights and make shorts or tiktoks, etc.

          • vividspecter@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            Having principles means being willing to give something up now and then, whether you get the outcome you want or not.

            • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              I already got rid of tiktok, twitter and facebook. Instagram is my last way of communicating with friends and to follow new releases of my favourite musicians etc. If I have to get rid of that too I might as well get rid of my phone and go live in a cave somewhere.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                For favorite musicians, I’d follow them on Tidal instead. They usually put out the same kind of info.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sorry you got downvoted. It’s not an unpopular sentiment, it’s just a very tired one at this point. If everyone who made that argument instead just left, the problem wouldn’t exist.

            And yeah, the people you follow are there because it’s where their audience is. If you want them to move, you gotta be the change you wanna see.

            I mean, you’re here, so I have to assume I’m preaching to the choir to some extent.

            • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’d actually be surprised. I’ve seen a lot of tiktok creators cross posting to loops as well as rednote.

              They know it’s there. Just feeling it out.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Lol less that 1% of users probably think about the prerequisite line of thinking to even start that argument, then probably 1% of those would make that argument. A fraction of a percent won’t cause any change at all.

              What has been proven time and time and time and time again are that humans are extremely extremely lazy and will not do anything at all unless there is a direct and present threat to them or their way of life. Hence why the wealth gap can be almost the worst in history with only 1 person actually having done something at all meaningful about it across the world. People still haven’t moved off of fucking twitter, they aren’t going to move off of Instagram. Especially not when “influencers” that draw the most people make their livelihood specifically from being on Instagram.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                People still haven’t moved off of fucking twitter, they aren’t going to move off of Instagram.

                Most folks I know, and socialize with, and celeb-follow on twitter have left already. Some (a lot) for threads. Most for bsky. Some the fediverse.

            • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              If everyone who made that argument instead just left, the problem wouldn’t exist.

              That is simply not even true, because that would be like 0.01% of all Instagram users. It wouldn’t make a dent.

              • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                From my bubble, Meta and Zuckerberg are widely despised by the general public and have been for the better part of the last couple decades. I’ve never met a person who wants to be on their platform, only people who have to be. But you’re probably right, most of the users probably don’t even know who Zuckerberg is, or that Facebook ever renamed themselves.

                But are the personalities you want to follow on there really pulling an audience that…simple?

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            What exactly are those people who you’re following doing for your quality of life? You need a car to get to work or do your errands. What does following a celebrity do for you?

          • arglebargle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oh no you won’t be able to waste time online watching people who don’t give a fuck about you. What ever will you do? Have some principals and walk away.

            You will survive and find some other dipshits to follow around don’t worry.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    What a fucking idiotic shitstorm entirely of their own making.

    Meta deserves all the shit they get for this transparent act of kowtowing.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It sure looks like they’re getting shit right now - I don’t disagree with your cynicism about long term effects though. If everyone “outraged” by this continues to use their service this will have very little effect on them in the long term.

        • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You know all the older folk on there want is a place to see their folks and share pictures. Wonder why there isn’t a strong alternative

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Technical problems.”

    “Following” and “unfollowing” are pretty basic aspects of the service. How interesting that the “technical problems” only have to do with these specific accounts.

    Anything under Meta (FB, Insta, WhatsApp), Twitter/X, TikTok - you should be considering these to be fascist mouthpieces and interpret information gained through them with that lens.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Personally I believe them only because meta has proven to be incompetent time and time again. I’m betting they migrated the followers to the new account, but forgot to update some foreign key and now it errors out when the old code tries to unfollow.

      The malice though is in doing this new migration scheme instead of the old method of “update the profile picture and bio”.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Depends on how carefully they follow separation of concerns, I suppose. I’ve seen errors exactly like this before where old data couldn’t be deleted but new data could be deleted without issue.

          To be clear, I am not defending them, nor am I entirely writing off the zuckbot doing this on purpose. Just without further evidence, it is easy for me to assume they are incompetent.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly makes me wonder the same. They might be trying to make it a more effective echo chamber