fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1349arrow-down15
arrow-up1344arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 hours agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-220 hours agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.