• Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    They always want to charge per user too instead of just charging a monthly fee. They’d rather have no money than not charge per user it’s actual crazy. Imagine any other industry turning away paying customers when it doesn’t cost them anything to have the customer. Software companies are insane. Can’t wait until their funding runs out.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Per user licensing is nothing compared to the ridiculousness of per cpu licensing.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        All of the SaaS I looked at would not be a situation where the end employee would generate tickets. Only I as the owner would and even then the software is kind of set it and forget it for my use case which I made clear to the salesman. Many of them to their credit did kick it up the management chain to get a different quote. Only 1 company out of four or five went for it.

        The problem I’ve run into is SaaS companies typically white collar companies who are used to paying per seat where employees generally make 6 figures, where as my blue collar company is full of dozens of part time employees where the per seat model breaks down.

        • Tiger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yah me too, for my small company per seat pricing is really painful. For some services we just have one account and share access; only one person logs in at a time and tells everyone else when they’re done.