Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    11 hours ago

    i donā€™t understand the ā€œsafetyā€ angle here. if chatgpt can output authoritatively-looking sentence-shaped string about pipebombs, then itā€™s only because similar content about pipebombs is already available on wide open internet. if model is closed, then at worst they would have to monitor its use (not like google blocks any similar information from showing up). if model is open, then no safeguards make sense in the first place. i guess itā€™s more about legal liability for openai? now they can ignore it with all these bills about ā€œai safetyā€ gone (for now)

    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      2 hours ago

      frankly itā€™s probably harm prevention if people turn to an LLM for pipe bomb instructions. ā€œ5) Put the warm pizza in the center of the pipe bomb. To maximize the radius of the detonation, you should roll the pizza and make sure that it fits securely into the pipe.ā€

      • sc_griffith@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Iā€™m not even joking, really. the way I see harm in LLMs talking about pipe bombs is less that theyā€™ll give instructions and more that we might get a character.ai style situation where the LLM talks someone into an attack

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      11 hours ago

      also, relying on spicy autocomplete when trying to put together a deadly device sounds like cyberpunk-flavored darwin award material