• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      I used to work at a condo building that chopped down a few trees without city permission. Talk about a spanking, they made the owners replace the trees and paid a fine of like $2k per tree

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    She definetly barked up the wrong tree. Best to leave them alone otherwise they will stick it to your bank account.

  • admiralteal
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    The judge also granted an injunction prohibiting Khatkar from entering or interfering with the claimant’s property.

    Slap the side and say “Ah, that’ll do it.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    The neighbouring properties were separated by a chain link fence, with a cedar hedge comprised on the side owned by a numbered company, 0973210 B.C. Ltd, according to the decision.

    Annnd you lost me

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you read the rest or did you stop there ? The lady repeatedly trespassed, was warned by the police she was trespassing and reduced healthy 15ft trees to 5 feet tall by repeatedly cutting them with a chainsaw.

      Imagine you’re renting a place and your psycho neighbour keeps hacking your trees with a chainsaw.

      Company owned or individually owned, that has nothing to do with it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Yeah we had a neighbor who didn’t like our tree and went up at nice to partly saw branches, do that it would look like they fell naturally during the next windstorm. Some people are just pricks and others’ greenery

    • @lasagna
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Sounds like a company owns the house and lets it out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I despise corporations and investment properties, but.I hate Karen’s too. In the end she fucked around and found out, whoever owned the damaged property is irrelevant.